[Entmib] FW: [psg.com #73] AutoReply: AlatrmStatusTC - notSupported versus indeterminate
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Fri, 21 November 2003 13:00 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA12274 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:00:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ANAtH-0004p9-Q2; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:00:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ANAsi-0004oM-H7 for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:59:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12252 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:59:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ANAsh-0001qy-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:59:27 -0500
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ANAsh-0001qT-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:59:27 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id hALCwtw06759 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:58:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <W3H9A6MJ>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:58:55 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340954DD52@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:58:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #73] AutoReply: AlatrmStatusTC - notSupported versus indeterminate
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Hi
Proposed Resolution for ent-state-73:
In the description of entStateAlarm replace"
"The alarm status for this entity. It does not include
the severity of alarms raised on child components."
With
"The alarm status for this entity. It does not include
the severity of alarms raised on child components.
A value of 'notSupported' means the entity does not
support the alarm status object. Note that this differs
from 'indeterminate' which means that that alarm state
is supported and there are alarms against this entity,
but the severity of some of the alarms is not known."
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: entity-state [mailto:rt+entity-state@rt.psg.com]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Subject: [psg.com #73] AutoReply: AlatrmStatusTC - notSupported versus
indeterminate
<clip>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com]
"A3) AlarmStatusTC - what does setting notSupported(0) bit mean? Is not
this same as indeterminate(7)?"
_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #73] AutoReply: AlatrmStatu… Sharon Chisholm