RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disab led - correct ive action required?
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Fri, 21 November 2003 19:37 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA28200 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:37:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ANH5Q-0006ux-6o; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:37:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ANH4U-0006qW-8x for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:36:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA28077 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ANH4R-0007WS-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:59 -0500
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ANH4R-0007WH-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:59 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id hALJZRw28534 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <W3H9BFX7>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:27 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340954E34A@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disab led - correct ive action required?
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:35:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Hi Well, the difference between 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 is that one can be made operational simply by enabling the administrative state while one requires some corrective action AND someone to enable the administrative state. I think this covers all the cases you are referring to. Or am I missing something? Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:13 PM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; entmib@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disabled - correct ive action required? Sharon, You are correct about the section number. The text I was commenting on is in Section 2.2.1 2.2.1 Admin State Locked, Operational State Disabled and Usage State Idle The entity is totally inoperable, it is not servicing any entities and it is also administratively prohibited from use. To make it available for use, both management permission and some corrective action are necessary. This is similar to an ifAdminStatus of down and ifOperStatus of down. I still believe that there is no need for a corrective action in all cases. In some cases restoring management permission by setting the admin state to unlock should be enough. The suggested text: The entity is totally inoperable, it is not servicing any entities and it is also administratively prohibited from use. To make it available for use, management permission (and in some cases corrective action) are necessary. This is similar to an ifAdminStatus of down and ifOperStatus of down. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: entmib-admin@ietf.org [mailto:entmib-admin@ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm > Sent: 21 November, 2003 8:38 PM > To: entmib@ietf.org > Subject: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational > State Disabled - correct ive action required? > > > Hi > > Proposed Resolution to ent-state-77: > > Actually, I believe what you are describing is in section 2.2.2. > > I propose that no change is required as a result of this comment. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: entity-state [mailto:rt+entity-state@rt.psg.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:24 AM > To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] > Subject: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operational State Disabled > - corrective > action required? > > <clip> > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com] > > "Section 2.2.1 in [in version 01]- A corrective action is not > necessary > in all cases to make an entity available for use. In some > cases setting > the admin state to unlock should be enough." > > _______________________________________________ > Entmib mailing list > Entmib@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib > _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operatiā¦ Sharon Chisholm
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #77] AutoReply: Operatiā¦ Sharon Chisholm