RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Wed, 02 February 2005 15:22 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA15602 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:22:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CwMHU-0006fk-ON; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:19:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CwM4c-00008g-Ab for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:05:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA12528 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:05:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.222.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CwMMy-0001bV-OG for entmib@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:24:42 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j12F57NU003653 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:05:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <ZXPVB1CJ>; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:05:06 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503C7A05A@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Andy Bierman (E-mail)" <abierman@cisco.com>, "Entmib-wg (E-mail)" <entmib@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:05:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Can the author/editor and/or the WG react please. I need (if possible) an answer by tomorrow (Thursday) 11am US eastern at the latest (that is, if we want to try and get this approved this week). Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: entmib-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:entmib-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf > Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 01:05 > To: Entmib-wg (E-mail) > Subject: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt > > > Feedback from IESG > > -----Original Message----- > From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > Ted Hardie > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 23:28 > To: iesg@ietf.org > Subject: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt > > > Minor, but should be fixed. The document currently says: > > entPhysicalUris OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX OCTET STRING > MAX-ACCESS read-write > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > "This object contains additional identification > information > about the physical entity. The object contains URIs and > therefore the syntax of this object must conform to RFC > 2396, section 2. > > Multiple URIs may be present and are separated by white > space characters. Leading and trailing white space > characters are ignored. > > If no additional identification information is known or > supported about the physical entity the object is not > instantiated. A zero length octet string may also be > returned in this case." > REFERENCE > "RFC 2396, Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic > Syntax, section 2, August 1998." > > This should be updated to the new URI RFC and a pointer to the > appropriate syntax restrictions. This text also does not limit > the types of URIs which may be present. If they are limited, > an enumerated list should be included. > > The document also uses "CLEI URI" to refer to a URN in the CLEI > namespace. That's technically correct, but it would be easier > to understand if CLEI URN was used. Here's an example: > > The entPhysicalUris object may be used to encode for > example a URI > containing a Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) URI for > the managed physical entity. The URN name space for CLEIs is > defined in [RFC CLEIURN], and the CLEI format is defined in > [T1.213][T1.213a]. > > Simply swapping out (CLEI) URI for (CLEI) URN would be fine. > > _______________________________________________ > Entmib mailing list > Entmib@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib > _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07.txt Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Andy Bierman
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Andy Bierman
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Kaj Tesink
- RE: [Entmib] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-entmib-v3-07… Margaret Wasserman