Re: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Issue Summary & Status

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:45:25AM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:

> Ok, the new draft is out, but there are still three unresolved issues to
> deal with.
> 
> Unresolved
> 
> 308 Shutting Down Admin State 
> 310 Alarm State Issues open entity-state 
> 329 Usage State Scope 
> 
> Resolved
> 
> 306 entStateTrap rename/oid to entStateNotifs 
> 307 'notSupported' is semantically wrong open  
> 309 Operational State Names and Concepts  
> 311 DateAndTimeOrZero ? open entity-state
> 312 Locked Admin State open entity-state 
> 322 Textual Convention Names (Prefix)  
> 325  OID Structure
> 326 Too many state 
> 327 More Editorial Issues  
> 328 Containment Hierach and entPhysicalContainedin 
> 330 Notification Varbinds 
> 332 More Standby State/Status Issues 
> 333 Relationship with Alarm MIB  
> 334 Table, Index Descriptions 
> 335 Notification Comments 

I personally did not see concensus on some of the issues that you 
report as resolved. For example, I did see more people speaking up
in favour of prefixed TC names. Also, the feedback on some of the
other items listed above were never really consistent with the
proposed resolution.

You seem to push a bit too strongly your opinion on some issues. 
This is why I like the see the chair jumping in to determine where 
we actually have concensus and where not and of course what the
determined concensus position actually is.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib