Re: [Enum] TEL URL enumservice registration document

On fredag, jan 31, 2003, at 19:40 Europe/Stockholm, Richard Shockey 
wrote:

> It was recently pointed out to me privately that we have no example in 
> 2916bis of a TEL URL.  The question was posed  .."are we going to 
> allow termination to non IP endpoints?"

Another thing, as Richard wrote, the answer to this question is 
obviously "yes", but it also scares me that the question is asked in 
the first place.

I thought it very clearly said that (a) any URI scheme can be used (b) 
enum services need to be registered via specific explicit documents.

Suggestions to changes to the document so it is clearer is appreciated. 
Silence is taken as "the document is fine as is".

Richard has as wg chair told me as editor of the document that he want 
one last version now, before Feb 24, so we can get 2916bis out the door.

It is needed, and I agree with him. We can not live with RFC 2916 any 
longer.

     paf

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum