IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Enum] Send-n, rat holes and real issues

"Jay Daley" <jay@nominet.org.uk> Fri, 04 July 2008 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <enum-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: enum-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-enum-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EE83A69CF; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2708A3A69CF for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7TOD6UmppFSL for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mx4.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CCD3A69AB for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc: Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date: X-MIMETrack:Content-Type; b=kgwdBQ7GfR/0hlTAsr0VuvYffZOVW4cW1iKyN0KNSEpp5S1E6B6FDT6b /QzEClt7CdLPVzW0yvYYSln333dihDHdMSatsTSjIVuuSc79hgIkOqrqj XBHrO1QkpsB6LGE;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=jay@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1215166561; x=1246702561; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20"Jay=20Daley"=20<jay@nominet.org.uk>|Subject:=20 Re:=20[Enum]=20Send-n,=20=20rat=20holes=20and=20real=20is sues|Date:=20Fri,=204=20Jul=202008=2011:15:45=20+0100 |Message-ID:=20<OF084B8335.E5BDC871-ON8025747C.0037B44E-8 025747C.0038442F@nominet.org.uk>|To:=20"Brian=20Rosen"=20 <br@brianrosen.net>|Cc:=20enum@ietf.org|MIME-Version:=201 .0|In-Reply-To:=20<03e001c8dd69$0b950800$e76af444@cis.neu star.com>|References:=20<OF21B77AFB.E1DF04F4-ON8025747A.0 073F615-8025747A.0076EB52@nominet.org.uk><018901c8dcb3$9f 3f1f70$e76af444@cis.neustar.com>=0D=0A=09<OFD555DBAD.B9D8 08B0-ON8025747B.0030C020-8025747B.003204A7@nominet.org.uk >=0D=0A=09<02dc01c8dd22$0e684480$e76af444@cis.neustar.com >=09<OF4915200D.E3139D34-ON8025747B.006BF731-8025747B.006 FAD5A@nominet.org.uk>=20<03e001c8dd69$0b950800$e76af444@c is.neustar.com>; bh=zc0SH+/7dvvwvFNtzkJCxdBjfrXmd8Zf6fZPx34QOM8=; b=k3n8VjUXKPhAwePD4bgzpOPVjW5UFYJQR37F8Ym3xVDZfxc+V8hf7tf3 Wtfo5VuyZCb++mv0JSrgYEPlhQzkVwqtXgzBza7QF+BXsMh8mOh5+O067 TfxgSCKKZ0iqSwp;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,302,1212361200"; d="scan'208";a="3899588"
Received: from notes1.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.128]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2008 11:15:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: <03e001c8dd69$0b950800$e76af444@cis.neustar.com>
References: <OF21B77AFB.E1DF04F4-ON8025747A.0073F615-8025747A.0076EB52@nominet.org.uk><018901c8dcb3$9f3f1f70$e76af444@cis.neustar.com> <OFD555DBAD.B9D808B0-ON8025747B.0030C020-8025747B.003204A7@nominet.org.uk> <02dc01c8dd22$0e684480$e76af444@cis.neustar.com> <OF4915200D.E3139D34-ON8025747B.006BF731-8025747B.006FAD5A@nominet.org.uk> <03e001c8dd69$0b950800$e76af444@cis.neustar.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build VMac_Beta85_20080115_MM2 January 15, 2008
Message-ID: <OF084B8335.E5BDC871-ON8025747C.0037B44E-8025747C.0038442F@nominet.org.uk>
From: Jay Daley <jay@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:15:45 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 7.0.1FP1 | May 25, 2006) at 04/07/2008 11:15:58 AM, Serialize complete at 04/07/2008 11:15:58 AM
Cc: enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] Send-n, rat holes and real issues
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

Brian

> Nah, I don't think you will preload everything, just cache what you use 
the
> most.  Download whatever else you need on demand.

Whether you preload or cache and download on demand, is still the same 
thing.  Your solution means any device that will do ENUM lookups needs 
access to a great big database.

> 
> The data I'm proposing gives you validation of number length.  It 
doesn't
> tell you that you have a working number. 

Exactly!!  Which is why we need send-n.

Jay
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

v2.40.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status