Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt
"Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk> Wed, 30 June 2004 13:21 UTC
From: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:21:27 -0400
To: "Russell, Nick, VF UK - Technology (TS)" <"Nick.Russell at vodafone.com">
Subject: Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt
In-Reply-To: <6FC554FA1F33BE4C9AC844FC3B3B7128010E1665@UKWMXM01>
Message-ID: <47FF20EE-CA97-11D8-81C7-000393A70BB2@roke.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: R
On 30 Jun 2004, at 12:13, Russell, Nick, VF UK - Technology (TS) wrote: Dear All, Just a quick question from a newbie on this list on section 4 "Fax Service Registration" of the below draft. Why is the "tel:" URI proposed to be used not the "fax:" URI as the "URI Scheme"? Are "fax:" URIs being discontinued (draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09 seems to hint at this)? Thanks, Nick Yes. the update to RFC2806 does not include them, so they're, in effect, deprecated. _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt Jeff Williams
- RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt Russell, Nick, VF UK - Technology (TS)
- Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)