Re: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ???
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 05 June 2002 16:01 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04662 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:01:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id MAA15986 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:01:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA14363; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:51:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA14334 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joy.songbird.com (IDENT:root@songbird.com [208.184.79.7]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04238 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bbprime.dcrocker.net (208.184.79.252.songbird.com [208.184.79.252] (may be forged)) by joy.songbird.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01703; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:54:12 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.1.2.2.20020605084828.03327c48@jay.songbird.com>
X-Sender: dhc@jay.songbird.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1.3 (Beta)
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:49:35 -0700
To: Richard Shockey <rich.shockey@NeuStar.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ???
Cc: enum@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020603125252.024e35b0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
References: <1C1EEC765F843E44996971A80682118B014B1427@opwinex02.corp.il luminet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
At 11:32 AM 6/3/2002 -0400, Richard Shockey wrote: >I'd like to re-note this message sent to the list earlier and poll the >list for any objections to taking this to Last Call as a Informational >document ASAP. EPP is IETF standards track. ENUM is IETF standards track. Why should not the use of ENUM for EPP also be standards track? I believe it has sufficient utility and that it was developed and reviewed in the appropriate IETF manner. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850 _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] EPP for E.164 Kevin McCandless
- Re: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Pfautz, Penn L, ALVAP
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Pfautz, Penn L, ALVAP
- RE: [Enum] EPP for E.164 - Start Last Call ??? Hollenbeck, Scott