IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Enum] ..and I quote

"Stastny, Richard" <richard.stastny@oefeg.at> Wed, 29 May 2002 07:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA05033 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2002 03:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id DAA15611 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 29 May 2002 03:10:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA14359; Wed, 29 May 2002 02:59:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA14322 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2002 02:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from oefeg-mail.oefeg.at (mail.oefeg.at [62.47.121.5]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id CAA04713 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2002 02:59:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by OEFEG-MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <LNN4BHY5>; Wed, 29 May 2002 08:46:36 +0200
Message-ID: <B1949C387101D411A95100508B8B951323C9BE@OEFEG-MAIL>
From: "Stastny, Richard" <richard.stastny@oefeg.at>
To: 'Patrik Fältström' <paf@cisco.com>, Lawrence Conroy <lwc@roke.co.uk>, enum@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Enum] ..and I quote
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 08:46:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id CAA14323
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Patrik wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:03 PM
> To: Lawrence Conroy; enum@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Enum] ..and I quote
>  
> --On 2002-05-27 20.12 +0100 Lawrence Conroy <lwc@roke.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > OK, if we need to add URI-scheme to the service field, we 
> add it. If 
> > we do this, then the sipvoice in the above extract might become 
> > "sip-voice".
> 
> Please stop using the same characters in the enumservice as 
> in the URI scheme.
> 
> Call the schemes "foo" and "bar", and try to explain what 
> they are about.

To which I reply:
Good Morning.
Huh?
Now I am totally confused.
Aren't you the (co)-author of rfc2916bis?
There I find:
   $ORIGIN 4.3.2.1.6.7.9.8.6.4.e164.arpa.
     IN NAPTR  10 10 "u" "E2U+sip"     "!^.*$!sip:paf@swip.net!"    .
     IN NAPTR 102 10 "u" "E2U+mailto"  "!^.*$!mailto:paf@swip.net!" .
     IN NAPTR 102 10 "u" "E2U+tel"     "!^(.*$)$!tel:\1!"     .

Maybe I missed something in the discussion last week, but then the draft has
to be updated substantially.

BTW, is now sipvoice or telvoice allowed or not? (provided I try to explain
it ;-)

Regards
Richard

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status