[Enum] Agenda for ENUM and Adelaide - The WG chair comes clean
Scott Petrack <scott.petrack@metatel.com> Wed, 22 March 2000 02:30 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29908 for <enum-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:30:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA09141; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:27:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA09110 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:27:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from adsl-151-203-17-31.metatel.office (root@adsl-151-203-17-31.bellatlantic.net [151.203.17.31]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29562 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:29:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (scott.petrack@localhost) by adsl-151-203-17-31.metatel.office (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00926 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:30:12 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: adsl-151-203-17-31.metatel.office: scott.petrack owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:30:12 -0500
From: Scott Petrack <scott.petrack@metatel.com>
X-Sender: scott.petrack@adsl-151-203-17-31.metatel.office
To: enum@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003210403060.1018-100000@adsl-151-203-17-31.metatel.office>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [Enum] Agenda for ENUM and Adelaide - The WG chair comes clean
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
Dear Friends: I wish to explain and apologize for my almost complete lack of presence during the last few months. What happened is quite simple: I became extremely ill in early January; this took up almost my entire time throughout the month and much of February. The time since then has been spent recovering my day job. I'm pretty much recovered now, but the end result of all of this is that I've pretty much been completely out of commission for exactly one "IETF-period". I fully realize that ENUM has been having some very interesting discussions without me, but my absence has really hurt the progression of the two drafts, of Anne and of Patrik. The good news is that our currently chartered work is of sufficiently narrow scope that I feel sure we can progress to a summer close. The bad news is that because of me, much time has been lost. I can only give my committment and the commitment of my company that I shall be absolutely be able to allocate the needed time and attention to get the job done. It is not appropriate to get into my personal details of the past few months; suffice it to say that it seems certain that what I had will no longer interfere with the performance of my duties. Here is how I suggest that we get back on track: 1. I propose the following agenda for Adelaide: a. discussion of draft-ietf-enum-rqmts-00.txt issues from the list b. discussion of draft-faltstrom-e164-05.txt issues from the list(s) c. Greg Vaudreuil has asked for time to present his point of view d. discussion of some other issues from the list Should someone else need to speak, I will be at the Hyatt in Adelaide from Friday on, and I am now fully back in email. 2. I intend to work double-time over the next few weeks to resolve the open issues of how ENUM fits into to other related groups. This is something I had no choice but to ignore during the past few months, as I could barely read email. Once again, apologies to all those who have been annoyed or frustrated by my lack of communication over the past few months. Such nonsense is over now. Since the last IETF, I see that many people have woken up to the tremendous potential that ENUM has. Scott _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] Agenda for ENUM and Adelaide - The WG chaiā¦ Scott Petrack