RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> Sat, 29 July 2000 19:04 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA04546 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:04:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA27561; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA27485 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spitfire.law.miami.edu (postfix@spitfire.law.miami.edu [129.171.187.10]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA04457 for <enum@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by spitfire.law.miami.edu (Postfix, from userid 1113) id C1F175C3B79; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spitfire.law.miami.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4EB5D3AEF; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:03:13 -0400
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Cc: rshockey@ix.netcom.com, enum@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ
In-Reply-To: <01D91AFB08B6D211BFD00008C7EABAE104A2C964@eseis04nok>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007291458430.27538-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
Currently ICANN's rules prohibit registrars and registries from offering privacy-enhanced registration services akin to "unlisted" phone numbers. To be fair, this policy was inherited from the prior regime (NFS/NSI), although ICANN's UDRP rules for removing domains from registrants give the current policy much greater teeth than the old one had. I have often wondered if the no-privacy policy contravenes European privacy law. I certainly don't think it is a good rule, and efforts to get ICANN to reform it will be welcome -- although they will be met with reflexive cries of horror by the copyright lobby, which thinks that DNS records help it trace copyright violators. [I've never understood that argument, since I would have thought what you need is the physical address of the host machine, which is quite a separate matter, but there you go.] I agree this is a major issue. On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 john.loughney@nokia.com wrote: > Richard, > > Thanks for the FAQ. I've only done a quick reading of it, > but I think it should be very useful. One thing that I > would like added would be more about security / privacy. > > Is there a way to grant/deny access to certain DNS > records? I haven't seen any. My 'fear' would be that > I would have many services in my personal ENUM DNS record > and then be harrassed by all sorts of new spam, SIP SPAM, > email SPAM, telemarketers, etc. > > cheers, > John > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: EXT Richard Shockey [mailto:rshockey@ix.netcom.com] > > Sent: July 26, 2000 23:47 > > To: enum@ietf.org > > Subject: [Enum] ENUM FAQ > > > > > > Since our work may be entering a new phase ..I've taken the > > liberty to > > trying to pull together some thinking about ENUM into a FAQ. > > > > This will probably not be a WG document but if any of you > > would like to > > contribute questions answers or comment on it generally you > > are welcome to > > do so. > > > > ################ > > > > > > > > > > ENUM Working Group > > Richard Shockey > > Internet-Draft: DRAFT-SHOCKEY-ENUM-FAQ-00.TXT NeuStar, Inc > > Expiration <1/2001> > > July 26, 2000 > > > > > > FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT ENUM > > > > This is a very preliminary draft. It has not been reviewed > > or accepted by > > the working group. Comments are eagerly sought, as are > > suggestions for > > additional questions and alternative answers. > > > > Status Of This Memo > > > > This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all > > provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. > > > > Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task > > Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that > > other groups > > may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. > > Internet-Drafts > > are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may > > be updated, > > replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is > > inappropriate > > to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them > > other than as > > "work in progress." > > > > The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at > > http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft > > Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. > > > > This document and related documents are discussed on the IETF > > Enum mailing > > list. To join the list, send mail to <mailto:enum- > > request@ietf.org?body=subscribe>. > > > > To contribute to the discussion, send mail to > > <mailto:enum@ietf.org> The > > Enum working group charter, including the current list of > > group documents, > > can be found at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/enum-charter.html. > > > > > > Copyright Notice > > Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. > > > > ABSTRACT > > > > The IETF ENUM work group has been chartered to develop > > protocols that map > > telephone numbers to resources typically found on the > > Internet , such as > > URI's, using the Domain Name Service. It has been proposed > > that a global > > ENUM service be created in the e164.arpa domain. How > > e164.arpa should be > > organized and administered is now a serious issue confronting > > the Internet > > Community. This document is provided as a list of common > > questions, and > > their answers, concerning E.164 numbers and their use on the > > Internet. Knowledge of Domain > > Name Service technology is assumed. > > > > INTRODUCTION > > > > The IETF ENUM work group has been chartered to develop > > protocols that map > > telephone numbers to Internet resources. The working group > > charter is > > specified at: > > > > <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/enum-charter.html> > > > > A Goals and Requirements specification is under active discussion. > > The current draft is: > > > > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-rqmts-01.txt> > > > > The central ENUM protocol document is: > > > > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-e164-dns-02.txt>. > > > > It describes the technique whereby a globally unique E.164 > > telephone number > > is placed under a single DNS administrative domain. Using classic DNS > > resolution, a client application could then discover > > resources associated > > with that number from NAPTR or SRV Resource Records. > > > > Several application developers and telecommunications service > > providers > > have expressed interest in quickly deploying ENUM based services. > > > > It has been proposed that a global ENUM service be created in > > the e164.arpa > > domain. > > > > How e164.arpa should be organized and administered is now a > > serious issue > > confronting the Internet Community. > > > > FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS > > > > WHAT IS ENUM? > > > > ENUM stands for Telephone Number Resolution. It is a > > chartered WG of the > > IETF <http://www.ietf.org>. The reason the work group exists > > is detailed > > in its charter. The URL is listed above. > > > > There have been numerous experimental trials of DNS based > > resolution of > > telephone number resources. The most significant of those was > > the TPC.INT > > fax experiment described in RFC 1709. Many of the concepts > > use by ENUM came > > out of that early work > > > > > > WHAT BENEFITS DOES ENUM GIVE TO USERS? > > > > The main benefits are: > > > > ENUM enables calling users or entities to make a selection > > from the range > > of services that are available especially over the Internet for > > communicating with a particular person or entity when the calling user > > knows only their telephone number. > > > > ENUM enables users to access Internet based services and > > resources from > > ordinary telephones where they are only be able to input digits > > > > ENUM enables users to specify their preferences for receiving incoming > > communications (eg specifying a preference for voicemail > > messages over live > > calls or indicating a destination for call forwarding). ENUM > > will give much > > improved user control over communications. > > > > There are many potential applications for ENUM and some are > > discussed in > > this document. > > > > WHAT IS E.164? > > > > E.164 is the international telephone numbering plan [Document > > ITU-T E.164] > > written and administered by the International > > Telecommunication Union (ITU) > > in Geneva <http://www.itu.int>. The plan specifies the > > format, structure, > > and administrative hierarchy of telephone numbers. At the > > root of the E.164 > > administrative hierarchy, the ITU issues country codes to sovereign > > national entities and thereby allocates new telephony > > numbering resources > > as needed. In addition there are other allocations for services and > > networks. Administration of telephone numbers within each country is > > officially governed by the appropriate national telecommunications > > regulatory agency (e.g. FCC in the US, > > CRTC in Canada, Oftel in UK). The regulator or their > > designated contractor > > performs the actual national number resource administration itself. > > > > HOW DOES ENUM WORK? > > > > The enum solution is driven , in part by the fact that most > > telephony > > users have telephone keypads [ 12 digit ] to work with. > > > > 1. A phone number is translated intoE.164 form by in > > concluding country > > code or area/city code, e.g. 918-9020 dialed in St. Louis would be > > translated to +1-314-918-9020, where +1 is the North American > > country code. > > 2. Remove all character parts from the digits. Example: 13149189020 > > 3. Reverse the order of the digits. Example: 02098194131 > > 4. Put dots (".") between each digit. Example: 0.2.0.9.8.1.9.4.1.3.1 > > 5. Append the domain "e164.arpa" to the end. Example: > > 0.2.0.9.8.1.9.4.1.3.1.e164.arpa > > 6. Perform a DNS query on this domain > > 7. Retrieve relevant NAPTR Resource records from the Name > > Server for this > > number and perform whatever relevant application required. > > > > WHY THE FUNNY REVERSAL OF THE NUMBER AND WHAT ARE ALL OF > > THOSE DOTS FOR? > > > > Each dot separates the number into administrative "domains" > > or zones in DNS > > terms. This accommodates delegation of authority at varying points > > throughout the e164.name space thereby avoiding the > > imposition of either a > > fixed delegation scheme worldwide or requiring clients to > > know that scheme > > in order to know where to put the dots. Delegation in a DNS name is > > structured from right to left. This > > is very important. See: > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2672.txt> for > > more details > > > > AM I GOING TO HAVE TO TYPE IN THOSE DOTS AND REVERSED NUMBERS > > TO USE ENUM? > > > > Definitely not! Your application will take care of all of > > this for you. > > You just enter in a phone number like you always do, into whatever > > application or device that supports ENUM, and it will take > > care of the > > conversion. > > > > WHY THE .ARPA TOP LEVEL DOMAIN? > > > > The .arpa domain has been designated to be used for Internet > > Infrastructure > > purposes. It is managed by the IANA in cooperation with the Internet > > technical community under the guidance of the Internet > > Architecture Board. > > The e164.arpa domain is believed to be the most appropriate > > place to host > > the e164 namespace on the Internet. ENUM constitutes an > > infrastructure > > support function by virtue of it providing a set of DNS-based > > resource > > directories, referenced by phone > > number, for use by various ENUM-enabled application clients (e.g. > > telephones, SIP servers, voice messaging systems). ENUM will > > not be used > > directly by people as a new way of navigating to web sites. > > Consequently, > > ENUM is an infrastructure application appropriate for use within the > > designated .arpa domain established for these purposes. > > > > WHAT ARE SRV AND NAPTR RECORDS? > > > > These are DNS Resource Records that will contain information > > about what > > Internet resources, services or applications that are > > associated with a > > particular phone number. Subscribers determine what those > > services are. > > > > For more information, see: > > > > SRV : <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt> > > NAPTR : > > http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-urn-naptr-rr-03.txt > > > > WHAT KINDS OF APPLICATIONS COULD USE ENUM? > > > > Since ENUM provides a generic way to perform telephone number-based > > resource discovery, there are lots of examples of ENUM-enabled > > applications, but several have come to the forefront. The > > voice messaging > > industry has been hard at work developing a comprehensive > > mechanism by > > which voice mail systems could exchange messages over IP > > networks. This > > work is called VPIM, or Voice Profile for Internet Messaging. > > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/vpim-charter.html. The > > industry has been looking for a way to discover the host name > > and domain > > for Internet based voice mail servers. The problem has been > > that a typical > > voice mail user only has a telephone number and a telephone > > keypad to work > > with. ENUM permits these VPIM servers to locate each other > > and exchange > > messages. > > > > Clearly the most active interest in ENUM service has been in Internet > > Telephony. It has been a long standing goal of the Voice over > > IP (VoIP) > > industry to make a phone call over the Internet as simple to > > make as a > > regular PSTN call. > > > > ENUM links a telephone number to a host or resources on the > > Internet that > > can connect the call, either end to end over IP networks or through a > > designated gateway to the PSTN. This would be very useful for > > connecting > > SIP <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/sip-charter.html> or > > H.323-capable > > endpoints that exist across domain boundaries. > > > > ENUM is general enough that multiple discrete services > > (applications) may > > all be associated with the same telephone number at the same > > time, each > > application associated with their own unique endpoint resources as > > provisioned in ENUM, assuming the subscriber has the > > appropriate clients > > supporting those services. ENUM does not require that all > > such telephone > > number-based services be provided by the same service > > provider (telco, ISP, > > whatever), even though the subscriber's right to use that particular > > telephone number may only flow from their having subscribed to one of > > them.Won't ENUM telephone routing confuse the > > regular, PSTN routing system? > > > > ENUM facilitates the discovery of resources associated with a > > telephone > > number, and hence facilitates how various applications will identify > > appropriate peer servers associated with an intended > > end-user. It does > > not, however, impact how those applications will operate once > > the location > > of an end-user associated application server has been > > established. Consequently, ENUM doesn't affect application-level > > functions, such as call routing, signaling, etc., regardless > > of the underlying application technology employed (ISUP, SIP, > > H.323). . > > [For example, see TRIP > > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-trip-02.txt>]. > > However it is possible that a telephone company call-routing > > mechanism > > could use ENUM technology as well. > > > > It is a core principle that in providing a unified resource discovery > > service, that ENUM will not change the existing right-to-use > > rules and > > principles for telephone numbers. ENUM is not intended to change how > > telephone numbers are administered, but instead facilitate a > > wide range of > > applications using phone numbers as subscriber names. > > Lastly, ENUM will > > not interfere with existing PSTN functions and technology, > > such as circuit > > switching, SS7 (ISUP or TCAP), or IN (Intelligent Networking), where > > similar resource discovery activities are performed through > > the PSTN legacy > > technologies. > > > > WHAT PROTOCOL DOES ENUM USE FOR INTERNET TELEPHONY? > > > > ENUM itself is "protocol agnostic" because it's application > > agnostic. It > > does not specify what applications a particular telephone number is > > associated with, but instead provides a unified way of discovering > > resources associated with it. For example it can work with > > either H.323 or > > the Session Initiation Protocol [SIP].See > > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-e164-dns-00.txt> > > for further details. > > > > I'VE HEARD THIS VOICE OVER IP STUFF DOESN'T WORK.? THERE ARE LOTS OF > > ARTICLES IN THE TECHNICAL PRESS THAT SAY IT JUST DOESN'T WORK. > > > > VoIP is an evolving technology that is in an early stage of > > development but > > rapidly improving. It is only a question of when, not if, Internet > > Telephony will become a reality, fully integrated with the > > existing, global > > telephone service. This is an orthogonal issue to ENUM, as > > ENUM is not > > intended solely to facilitate VoIP, but a range of > > applications where a > > telephone number is used as a subscriber name. > > > > DO I "OWN" MY PHONE NUMBER? > > > > The ITU provides guidelines for the structure of phone numbers. They > > allocate part of the structure of the phone number, the > > country code, to > > countries. Each country's national regulatory agency (NRA) > > determines the > > remaining structure of the phone numbers within their > > country. The NRA > > also designates a national number administrator (NNA), in > > many countries > > the NRA is the NNA. The NNA allocates blocks of numbers to > > communications > > service providers. Communications service providers allocate > > numbers to > > their users. When a user disconnects > > their service, after an appropriate aging interval, the > > number becomes an > > available resource to the service provider for the purposes > > of reassignment > > to a new or different user. > > > > It is generally accepted that there are no property rights > > associated with > > numbers. That means you cannot sell your telephone number to > > someone else, > > unlike the fact that you could sell an Internet domain name > > under your > > control. As a matter of fact user's phone numbers get > > changed without > > their consent quite frequently. In the US, for example, it > > results from an > > area code split, where the 3-digit area code prefix is changed in the > > user's geographic area, but usually not the last 7 digits. > > However, when > > this happens, the user no longer > > has the same 10-digit phone number they once had. > > > > It is becoming more common for users to have more control > > over their phone > > numbers. In many countries with rules and regulations about > > telephone > > number portability, you can take your telephone number from > > carrier to > > carrier or from service type to service type (e.g., land-line > > to mobile) as > > you wish. Regulations vary from country to country. > > > > Within the ENUM community it is the general view that the telephone > > subscriber representatives [ISP's, carriers, etc], would be > > allowed to > > determine what resources are associated with that telephone > > number within > > the ENUM service. > > > > > > WHAT HAPPENS TO THE NUMBER WHEN A SUBSCRIBER PORTS FROM ONE SERVICE > > PROVIDER TO ANOTHER? > > > > When a number ports, the service provider of record changes. > > That is the > > industry now recognizes a different service provider as the > > holder for that > > particular number. This is important for routing and billing > > purposes. > > > > The subscriber should still be able to continue using their > > ENUM-enabled > > services, assuming their new service provider(s) support > > them. Naturally, > > the actual location of server resources identified by ENUM > > will likely > > change as the subscriber changes any of the underlying > > service providers. > > > > When the user disconnects the number goes back to the original service > > provider's inventory, not to the new service provider's inventory. > > > > WHAT HAPPENS TO THE ENUM SERVICES WHEN A SUBSCRIBER CANCELS > > TELEPHONE SERVICE? > > > > As we now know the number returns to the communications > > service provider's > > inventory for the purposes of reassignment. The subscriber > > that cancels > > their telephone service will have to cancel the associations > > that number > > has with all ENUM services, even those provided by other service > > providers. If this was not done the new user of that > > telephone number > > could have a conflict with the old user. On the other hand, > > where number > > portability is available, a user has the option of porting > > their number > > over to a new service provider instead of canceling their > > existing service > > and losing their current number. > > > > COULD ENUM BE USED TO PROVIDE TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTABILITY? > > > > In those countries that do not yet have a centralized database > > administration service, having a shared directory service > > like ENUM might > > be of interest. However, ENUM is not intended to serve this > > function, as > > there are very > > significant technical, regulatory, security, and operational > > limitations in > > using ENUM for this purpose. ENUM is a shared resource > > discovery service, > > not an industry provisioning service. In most countries where number > > portability is deployed, telephone service providers are > > generally required > > to comply with regulatory/industry processes, procedures, and > > systems, > > regardless of the underlying technology they employ for > > telephony service > > delivery (SIP, H.323, circuit-switched, or string-and-cans). > > How ENUM is > > administered in those countries will also likely require mirroring of > > provisioning rules (e.g. anti-slamming) employed for number > > portability and > > number administration so as to ensure that service providers using > > ENUM-enabled services do not violate applicable regulatory rules or > > industry guidelines. ENUM is another downstream use of numbering > > provisioning and administration activities, and will need to > > be deployed > > consistent with applicable national requirements, it does not > > create an > > alternate numbering universe with its own set of rules and policies. > > > > HOW IS THE USER OF A NUMBER AUTHENTICATED? > > > > Users could be corporations, individuals, government > > agencies, military, > > and hosts of other non-individual users. Service providers typically > > assign large blocks of numbers to these entities. The > > telecom manager > > within these entities then assigns numbers to users. So even > > the service > > providers cannot identify the users for a very large portion of the > > allocated numbers. > > > > This is an unresolved issue but one that must be resolved prior to > > deploying a robust and secure ENUM service. It's likely that > > the service > > provider that allocated the number(s) to the user will be > > involved in the > > process of authentication. > > > > WELL WHAT ABOUT PRIVATE NUMBERING PLANS WITHIN A COMPANY? > > > > Excellent question. The ENUM protocol can be used in private > > numbering > > plans the same way it can be used in the public E.164 number > > plan. The > > Internet Telephony gateway or proxy needs some intelligence > > to "decode" a > > particular dialing string and then decide how to look up > > resources for that > > particular number. Instead of looking for resources in e164.arpa the > > gateway or proxy would look for SRV or NAPTR records for > > private numbers > > under some other structure, such as > > e164.bigcompany.com . > > > > WHAT ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES LIKE 911 OR 112 [EUROPE]? > > > > In general, emergency service numbers are "access codes" and > > not "E.164 > > numbers", and will not be part of ENUM services. > > > > HOW WILL THE E164.ARPA DOMAIN BE ORGANIZED? > > > > One convenient way of doing this would be to delegate > > according to the 243 > > country codes designated by the ITU. It's important to understand, > > however, that delegation in DNS can occur at any digit, or > > zone domain in > > DNS terms > > > > So within the root e164.arpa there would be an NS listing for > > 1.e164.arpa > > representing the top level of the North American Numbering Plan. [US, > > Canada, and several Caribbean countries] > > > > A NS listing for -.4.4.e164.arpa - representing the top level > > (44) of the UK > > A NS listing for - 4.6.e164.arpa - representing the top level (46) > > of Sweden. > > A NS listing for - 8.1.e164.arpa - representing the top level > > (81) of Japan. > > A NS listing for - 8.5.3.e164.arpa - representing the top > > level (358) of > > Finland. > > > > At the national TN/NS level further NS delegation [DNAME, > > CNAME, PTR] can > > occur to enterprises, TN/NS application service providers, > > carriers, and > > even individuals who have DNS servers in their house. > > > > WHO WILL ADMINISTER THESE NATIONAL TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME SERVERS? > > > > There are many competent companies or organizations that can > > operate these > > servers. A number of companies have already come forward to > > express their > > interest in running these servers, initially free of charge and on an > > experimental basis, until such time as consensus can be > > reached on how this > > system is to ultimately organize. > > > > Some theories on how this system will be organized on a > > permanent basis > > will be discussed a little later in this FAQ. There are a number of > > regulatory constraints in various countries that might apply > > on the ENUM > > administrator, name service operators, as well as delegation > > policies below > > the national level. For example, where local telephony > > service competition > > and number portability are being deployed in a country, it is > > not unusual > > that a neutral third party is required to provide master database > > administration services, and a requirement for anti-slamming and > > non-reliance on competing carriers for routing or > > resolution functions. > > > > AM I ULTIMATELY GOING TO HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE MY TELEPHONE NUMBER ENUM > > PROVISIONED? > > > > Probably yes, but most likely the costs will be indirectly recovered > > through the underlying prices for ENUM-enabled services that > > subscribers > > pay. This is a DNS-based system. If you want a domain name > > registered in > > DNS someone must pay for that. Listing telephone numbers will be no > > different. Whether the cost will be charged directly to the > > subscriber or > > will be an indirect charge as part of some larger services > > will depend on > > those offering the services. > > > > Remember you do not have to ENUM list your phone number. ENUM > > would be a > > subscriber-controlled "opt-in" system to "announce", over the > > Internet, the > > availability of a particular telephone number to accept > > service sessions > > and how to manage those sessions as a result of having > > subscribed to an > > ENUM-enabled service. If you do not have an Internet > > telephony device or > > service you will likely not need to list your number. On the > > other hand, > > subscribers may not necessarily be aware they've subscribed to such a > > service, and have had ENUM provisioned for that service by > > their service > > provider on their behalf. > > > > AM I GOING TO HAVE CONTROL OVER HOW MY PHONE NUMBER IS USED > > IN THIS SYSTEM? > > > > Ultimately yes. We want to repeat that the first principal in > > the creation > > and operation of a global ENUM service is that the phone > > number subscriber > > or their designated representatives is the ultimate decision > > maker on how a > > DNS record for a phone number is to be provisioned. > > > > ARE THERE ANY EXAMPLES OF GLOBAL NAMESPACE DELEGATION THAT SHOULD BE > > CONSIDERED > > AS MODELS? > > > > The closest, technical equivalent is in-addr.arpa. That > > domain provides a > > reverse mapping, from IP address to domain name. It is used > > as part of the > > Internet infrastructure operation, to help authenticate an IP > > address and > > identify the operator associated with an IP address. It is not seen > > directly by users. The same is true for e164.arpa. It will be for > > operational infrastructure, rather than for directl access by > > end users. > > > > As with e164.arpa, in-addr.arpa, allocations are > > hierarchical, according to > > the infrastructure administrative structure. For in-addr.arpa, the > > hierarchy uses the "CIDR" address allocation hierarchy. For > > e164.arpa, the > > hierarchy will be based on the ITU E.164 Recommendation. > > > > WHO CAN ADMINISTER THE ENUM REGISTRY IN THE NEAR-TERM? > > > > ENUM is approaching the stage where the industry will want to start > > interoperability testing. And they will want to test using > > the e164.arpa > > domain. The interoperability test would have the same > > principles that > > current ones do; no charge, sharing of information, etc.. > > > > A. One method of enabling the registry would be to develop an > > RFC that > > defines the interim delegation principles for IANA as well as > > principles > > for the transition to the permanent registry. > > > > WHAT CAN BE DONE IN THE LONG TERM? > > > > There will need to be a formal effort to define and establish > > the structure > > for this activity. An example of the charter for that effort > > would be: > > > > 1. Define the global ENUM Service. > > 2. Perform the task of certifying organizations to IANA that wish to > > operate national TN/NS once they have been nominated by their > > respective > > nation states. > > 3. Coordinate technical standards for the operation of ENUM service in > > cooperation with the IETF. > > 4. Establish guidelines and policies, which national TN/NS > > administrators > > operate. > > 5. Promote public policy on how ENUM resources should be used. > > > > Oversight for this activity should be constituted that > > comprise several > > constituencies, such as > > > > 1. The potential ENUM user community > > 2. The potential ENUM provider community > > 3. National governments, at least as an advisory > > 4. IAB-IESG representatives > > 5. others? > > > > FORGET ALL THIS POLICY TALK...HOW IS ENUM GOING TO WORK FOR > > ME? WHAT DOES > > THIS SYSTEM LOOK LIKE TO ME... JOHN DOE TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBER? > > HOW WILL THE > > RIGHTS OF TELEPHONE NUMBER SUBSCRIBERS BE PROTECTED? > > > > This is an essential question that must be resolved, but a > > clear statement > > of policy protecting subscribers should be part of any ENUM > > system charter. > > > > A simple answer is by respecting existing regulatory and > > business rules > > regarding number administration, slamming, non-reliance, etc. Only by > > replicating or re-implementing ENUM analogs to the existing > > rules of the > > road will we avoid a wide range of very serious > > administrative, operational > > and political conflicts. > > > > HOW ARE YOU GOING TO PREVENT "SLAMMING" OR "HIJACKING"? > > > > Slamming, or the involuntary transfer of service provider, > > must be avoided > > in any ENUM system. However it is a serious problem in the > > PSTN and we > > must be careful not elsewhere. Note that anti-slamming fundamentally > > requires a neutral third party solution. The US industry is > > grappling with > > this on long distance right now. It was solved on number > > portability from > > the outset. Authenticated subscriber access is not a total solution, > > because if a subscriber disconnects their telephony service, > > they lose > > rights to the phone number. Consequently, some combination > > of originator > > authentication as well as telephone number rights validation, using > > existing new and existing validation sources, can be used to > > solve the > > problem, depending on the level of standard required. > > > > WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF E164.ARPA DEPLOYMENT ON THE GLOBAL DNS SYSTEM? > > > > We don't know. This is going to need research, such as the > > effect of "wrong > > dials" on the root of e164. That is, caller specification of a wrong > > number can result in many additional queries to the e164.arpa root. > > > > Additional work will be necessary in advising ENUM > > applications such things > > as the level of data caching necessary in order relieve > > stress -- suppress > > escalating of poorly formed queries - mis-dials - or cache > > misses -- on the > > root structure. > > > > For telephony applications, performance and load engineering > > is critical, > > as query volumes from small to medium size cities can easily > > reach many > > thousands per second alone. Response times, as well as > > transaction loads, > > must be carefully considered. Conventional DNS caching is of > > significantly > > reduced value in ENUM due to the huge size of the name space > > and relatively > > even distribution of queries into the space over arbitrary time > > intervals. Unlike conventional DNS queries, calls volumes > > aren't highly > > concentrated into a popular small subset of the number space. > > > > WHAT WILL BE THE EFFORT TO ADMINISTER THE ROOT OF THE > > E164.ARPA NAMESPACE? > > > > Any solution ought to require little or no work on the part of the > > e164.arpa root administrator. Optimally the root of e164.arpa should > > contain a small listing of all of the national ENUM top level > > country code > > name servers as described above. > > > > SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS: > > > > Authentication of ENUM provisioning requests, validation of telephone > > number use rights where appropriate, and security of > > e164.arpa zone roots, > > poses the primary security concerns for ENUM. > > > > ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: > > > > The author wants to acknowledge the following individuals in > > preparing this > > document, though any errors or omissions are the > > responsibility of the > > author. Thanks to :Dave Crocker, Mark Foster, Tom McGarry, > > John Horrocks > > > > REFERENCES: > > > > AUTHOR: > > > > Richard Shockey > > Senior Technical Industry Liaison > > NeuStar > > 1120 Vermont Ave N.W. > > Washington DC 20005 > > Tel: +1 314.503.0640 > > Fax: +1 815.333.1237 > > Email: rshockey@ix.netcom.com > > rich.shockey@neustar.com > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Please Note New Contact Information: > > > > Richard Shockey > > Shockey Consulting LLC > > 5237 Sutherland > > St. Louis, MO 63109 > > Voice 314.503.0640 > > eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax) > > INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > enum mailing list > > enum@ietf.org > > http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum > > > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum > -- Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm -->It's hot here.<-- _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ john.loughney
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- [Enum] ENUM FAQ Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Eric Brunner
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Dave Crocker
- Re: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Eric Brunner
- Re: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- RE: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Manfredi, Albert E
- Re[2]: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Andrew.Gallant
- Re: Re[2]: [Enum] ENUM FAQ Brian F. G. Bidulock