Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-experiences-00.txt

Hi folks,
  Why is it that you click the send button, and THEN see the typos?
In the penultimate sentence of the 3rd paragraph of section 3.1 of
this fine document there's something that might confuse the confusable.
    To clarify:
"For example, a NAPTR with a "sip" ENUMservice may have a
low ORDER field value, and yet is chosen before a NAPTR with an "h323"
ENUMservice and a high ORDER value".
    means:
"For example, a NAPTR with a "sip" ENUMservice may have a
"losing" ORDER field value, and yet is chosen before a NAPTR with an
"h323" ENUMservice and a "winning" ORDER value".
It does not mean low as in numerically smaller value and high as 
numerically larger
value.

We now return you to your prognostications on Privacy and Golden vs. 
Silver trees.

(on the latter, perhaps (i) we should include "glass tree" to describe 
a tree that
is transparent to most users and (ii) given the level of philosophical 
discussion,
 if a tree is invisible, does it make a sound when it crashes?).

all the best,
  Lawrence
On 12 Jul 2004, at 20:38, Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Telephone Number Mapping Working 
Group of the IETF.

	Title		: ENUM Implementation Issues and Experiences
	Author(s)	: L. Conroy, K. Fujiwara
	Filename	: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-00.txt
	Pages		: 0
	Date		: 2004-7-12
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum