Re: [Enum] Final Agenda for ENUM WG - IETF 55 Atlanta
Lawrence Conroy <lwc@roke.co.uk> Thu, 07 November 2002 10:06 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA08686 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:06:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA7A80l01551 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:08:00 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA7A7vv01544; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:07:57 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA7A6tv00887 for <enum@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:06:55 -0500
Received: from babelfish.srmr.co.uk (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id FAA08673; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 05:04:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from babelfish.srmr.co.uk [193.118.205.14] by babelfish.srmr.co.uk (AppleMailServer 10.1.4.0) id 2065u via TCP with SMTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:06:47 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: lwc@127.0.0.1
Message-Id: <p05200f01b9efe8a8ae47@babelfish.srmr.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021106102217.03e73ae8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021106102217.03e73ae8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:06:49 +0000
To: Richard Shockey <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>, enum@ietf.org
From: Lawrence Conroy <lwc@roke.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Enum] Final Agenda for ENUM WG - IETF 55 Atlanta
Cc: agenda@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
At 9:13 pm -0500 6/11/02, Richard Shockey wrote: >MONDAY, November 18, 2002 > >1130-1300 Break >1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I > >TSV enum Telephone Number Mapping WG <snip> >NOTE on Management issue: The IPTEL WG has now assumed >responsibility for all telephony related URI development including >the TEL URL itself. Whether this draft even remains in the ENUM WG >is now an issue. After polling the IPTEL Chairs we can revisit the >issues in the ENUM WG due to time constraints...however the proper >place for this draft in the future will have to be clarified. > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brandner-enum-uri-00.txt I'm trying to see where in the draft it says that this is a telephony URL. It does say that it's intended ONLY to trigger an ENUM lookup (i.e. in DNS) and NOT trigger a phone call. One could equally say that dap is a telephony URL. all the best, Lawrence -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roke Manor Research : This information is provided "as is" and is not <mailto:lwc@roke.co.uk>: intended to create any contractual or legal <tel:+441794833666> : relationship. _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] Final Agenda for ENUM WG - IETF 55 Atlanta Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Final Agenda for ENUM WG - IETF 55 Atl… Lawrence Conroy