RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture
"Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz@att.com> Thu, 09 February 2006 14:13 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F7CY7-0001Ss-BZ; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:13:31 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F7CY5-0001RC-QV for enum@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:13:29 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24523 for <enum@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:11:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com ([216.82.241.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Ckf-0000tS-NL for enum@ietf.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:26:34 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ppfautz@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1139494335!7399859!17
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4]
Received: (qmail 27255 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2006 14:13:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO attrh2i.attrh.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-8.tower-121.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2006 14:13:02 -0000
Received: from ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com (135.37.16.8) by attrh2i.attrh.att.com (7.2.052) id 43CF037500336E96; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:13:00 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:12:57 -0500
Message-ID: <34DA635B184A644DA4588E260EC0A25A0C1CEFD1@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com>
Thread-Topic: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture
Thread-Index: AcYs2rtZ6tqak9J3SzmyfOyom/AfWQApswoA
From: "Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz@att.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, enum@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Nice summary of the validation issue. A couple of questions for Alexander and Bernie: 1. The disjoint roles example in Section 5.2 shows the Validation Entity in communication with the Number Assignment Entity. Is your intent that such communication be considered a requirement of validation or merely one way in which it may be accomplished? 2. You may want to consider the effects of number portability on the process when the CSP is the NAE. When a number is ported, the CSP that assigned the number may no longer be in a position to verify number assignment. And yet the new CSP for the number is not the entity that originally assigned the number and was delegated the range from the NNPA. Where proper NP architectures (i.e. all-call query) have been implemented there is a database that can, if accessible to the VE, identify the current CSP. In other architectures different procedures will be required. Penn -----Original Message----- From: enum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:05 PM To: enum@ietf.org Cc: Patrik Fältström; Peterson,Jon; Allison Mankin Subject: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture Title : ENUM Validation Architecture Author(s) : A. Mayrhofer, B. Hoeneisen Filename : draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-01.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2006-2-7 An ENUM domain name is tightly coupled with the underlying E.164 number. The process of verifying whether or not the Registrant of an ENUM domain name is identical to the Assignee of the corresponding E.164 number is commonly called "validation". This document describes validation requirements and a high level architecture for an ENUM validation infrastructure. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-01.txt The intent of the last call is to solicit comments before submitting the ID to the IESG as a Proposed Standard. This document has been under discussion since early 2005. The purpose of a working group Last Call is in the style of "speak now or forever hold your peace" in case there are fundamental objections which have not gotten previous or adequate discussion, or minor errors which need correction. Work group last call will extend for 2 weeks or so from today Feb 8 until at least Feb 24 though we can modify that if new issues come up. -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683 Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Valid… Richard Shockey
- [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Valid… Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM V… Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM V… Mowafy, Hala