[Enum] RE: draft-livingood-enum-voicemsg-00

In theory, as co-chair, have no objections to this request. 

If anyone has objections to making this a WG document post them now or
forever hold your peace. 

This is a straight forward document well within current charter and I dont
think it would be useful to delay this by applying the new registration
procedure, which BTW needs to be worked on NOW well in advance of Vancouver.
Hint Bernie :-) !! 

I do suggest that you beef up the issue of why RFC 4238 is not appropriate
for the application you choose. 

This will come under some scrutiny from the VPIM/LEMONADE WG people. You
might run it past them for comments etc.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Livingood, Jason [mailto:Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com]
>  Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:34 AM
>  To: Richard Shockey; Patrik Fältström; enum@ietf.org
>  Cc: Zhou, Tong; Ferrise, Rich; Harvey, Chris; Don Troshynski; Hadriel
>  Kaplan
>  Subject: draft-livingood-enum-voicemsg-00
>  
>  Given that the WG is winding down, and that the co-authors of this new
>  I-D wish to make substantive progress before IETF 70, we are
>  requesting approval of the WG chairs to make this an official WG
>  draft.
>  
>  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-livingood-enum-voicemsg-
>  00.txt
>  
>  Regards
>  Jason Livingood

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum