Re: [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow
"Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk> Tue, 02 March 2004 16:41 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18492 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:41:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCxC-0004wx-Mv for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:41:11 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i22GfA1l018976 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:41:10 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCx4-0004vc-3k; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:41:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCwf-0004uD-GX for enum@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:40:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18444 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:40:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCwe-0000Zz-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:40:36 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCvk-0000SL-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:39:40 -0500
Received: from rsys001a.roke.co.uk ([193.118.192.110]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCuv-0000DW-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:38:49 -0500
Received: by rsys001a.roke.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <1ZGML0TG>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:38:09 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (orion.roke.co.uk [193.118.192.66]) by rsys002a.roke.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 1ZGN1VPS; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:38:07 -0000
From: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Cc: enum@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040302005036.0436eb10@popd.ix.netcom.com>
References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040302005036.0436eb10@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <FAF1F266-6C67-11D8-AD20-00039355516C@roke.co.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:38:05 +0000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Folks, this looks fine to me - as it did when I first looked at it. I note in passing how long this has been hanging around dependent on the perpetually draft 2916bis (It refers to rfc2916bis-04, so we can guess :). One slight point for the Author's 48 - In the references section is mention of the "Full-mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail" draft which was probably current when this ifax enumservice draft was issued. Has this been updated/made into an RFC in the interim? It's a minor point, as there is no actual reference in the body text to this. Whilst we're on nits, the [KEYWORDS] reference isn't spelt out. atb, Lawrence On 2 Mar 2004, at 5:53 am, Richard Shockey wrote: > > There has been some discussion among the AD's and the WG chairs of the > FAX WG and Patrick myself whether there has been sufficient cross > review of the attached document. > > I have privately informed the AD" that this document was well known to > the ENUM WG and that we certainly approved of its advancement. > > If there is a problem ..speak now or tomorrow at 9 AM. > > ######### > > IFAX service of ENUM > <draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-01.txt> > > Status: Proposed Standard > > Summary: > This document describes the functional specification > and the definition of the ENUM NAPTR record, for IFax > service. IFax is "Facsimile using Internet Mail". For > this use, the DNS returns the email address of the > referenced IFax system. This mechanism allows email-based > fax communication to use telephone numbers, rather than > requiring that the sender already know the recipient > email address. > > Working Group Last Call Result: > At San Francisco's meeting our WG agreed to the content. > The I-D was submitted for IETF-FAX WG Last Call on April 11. > During WG LC period, there were no comments. > It sucessfully finished on April 30. > > ............... > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives > NeuStar Inc. > 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 > sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org ENUM +87810-13313-31331 > PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 > 815.333.1237 > <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or > <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> > <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum > _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow.. Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)