Re: [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow

"Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk> Tue, 02 March 2004 16:41 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18492 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:41:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCxC-0004wx-Mv for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:41:11 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i22GfA1l018976 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:41:10 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCx4-0004vc-3k; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:41:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyCwf-0004uD-GX for enum@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:40:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18444 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:40:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCwe-0000Zz-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:40:36 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCvk-0000SL-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:39:40 -0500
Received: from rsys001a.roke.co.uk ([193.118.192.110]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyCuv-0000DW-00 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:38:49 -0500
Received: by rsys001a.roke.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <1ZGML0TG>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:38:09 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (orion.roke.co.uk [193.118.192.66]) by rsys002a.roke.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 1ZGN1VPS; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:38:07 -0000
From: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <lwc@roke.co.uk>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Cc: enum@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040302005036.0436eb10@popd.ix.netcom.com>
References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040302005036.0436eb10@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <FAF1F266-6C67-11D8-AD20-00039355516C@roke.co.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Enum] Additional Agenda item for Tomorrow
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:38:05 +0000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Folks,
   this looks fine to me - as it did when I first looked at it.

I note in passing how long this has been hanging around dependent
on the perpetually draft 2916bis (It refers to rfc2916bis-04, so
we can guess :).

One slight point for the Author's 48 - In the references section
is mention of the "Full-mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail" draft
which was probably current when this ifax enumservice draft was issued.
Has this been updated/made into an RFC in the interim? It's a minor
point, as there is no actual reference in the body text to this.
Whilst we're on nits, the [KEYWORDS] reference isn't spelt out.

atb,
   Lawrence

On 2 Mar 2004, at 5:53 am, Richard Shockey wrote:

>
> There has been some discussion among the AD's and the WG chairs of the 
> FAX WG and Patrick myself whether there has been sufficient cross 
> review of the attached document.
>
> I have privately informed the AD" that this document was well known to 
> the ENUM WG and that we certainly approved of its advancement.
>
> If there is a problem ..speak now or tomorrow at 9 AM.
>
> #########
>
> IFAX service of ENUM
> <draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-01.txt>
>
> Status: Proposed Standard
>
> Summary:
>      This document describes the functional specification
>      and the definition of the ENUM NAPTR record, for IFax
>      service. IFax is "Facsimile using Internet Mail".  For
>      this use, the DNS returns the email address of the
>      referenced IFax system. This mechanism allows email-based
>      fax communication to use telephone numbers, rather than
>      requiring that the sender already know the recipient
>      email address.
>
> Working Group Last Call Result:
> At San Francisco's meeting our WG agreed to the content.
> The I-D was submitted for IETF-FAX WG Last Call on April 11.
> During WG LC period, there were no comments.
> It sucessfully finished on April 30.
>
> ...............
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
> NeuStar Inc.
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
> sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   ENUM +87810-13313-31331
> PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1 
> 815.333.1237
> <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or 
> <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum