Re: [eppext] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03.txt>

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Tue, 05 January 2016 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A70C1ACE64; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5NijQVzN-XJ5; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 003381ACE63; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:12 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:12 -0800
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd@ietf.org>, "simon@josefsson.org" <simon@josefsson.org>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>
Thread-Topic: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHRLmtJ4UiVMH22GUym0u3Hd1jLwg==
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 02:00:11 +0000
Message-ID: <D2B06319.EBE88%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
References: <20151204081025.21059.9597.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+9X=ft5OPpjjHiVigGcS1Z6LxADQ2mJWAh-10PywQxsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+9X=ft5OPpjjHiVigGcS1Z6LxADQ2mJWAh-10PywQxsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.9.151119
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.35.1]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3534775208_3115129"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/93RYO4vcV1ESE22bErXdyVjtpWk>
Cc: "nkong@cnnic.cn" <nkong@cnnic.cn>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03.txt>
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 02:00:16 -0000

Simon, Barry, Russ,


Thank you for your feedback on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd version 03.
 

I uploaded version 04
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04) of the I-D. I
think that this version addresses your concerns.
 

Your feedback is welcomed and appreciated.
 

Regards,
Gustavo



On 12/7/15, 11:52, "barryleiba@gmail.com on behalf of Barry Leiba"
<barryleiba@gmail.com on behalf of barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

>> I-D: <draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-03.txt>
>> ID Tracker URL: 
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd/
>>
>> IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to
>> Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
>
>During last call I saw a Gen-ART review from Russ Housley and a SecDir
>review from Simon Josefsson.  I saw no responses to either, so I'm
>leaving this in the "Waiting for AD Go-Ahead" state pending responses
>to those reviews and addressing of the issues raised.
>
>For easy reference...
>Gen-ART review:
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg12584.html
>SecDir review: 
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06248.html
>
>Barry, ART AD