[eppext] May 2014: Extensions registry document to IESG

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4091A0297 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 05:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4-nIDbDSP2D for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 05:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og114.obsmtp.com (exprod6og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7B81A0296 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 05:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob114.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKU2zL1RVbWmNFp1cPB/uxX1i4D4D/y4Ko@postini.com; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:36:37 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s49CaaZX003598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <eppext@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:36:37 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:36:36 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: May 2014: Extensions registry document to IESG
Thread-Index: Ac9rg0173H41hCEqSP6rCOz+o/ZFEw==
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:36:36 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F493D0F3F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/liPQdY5oBo8pfJzZa5AjeRGgyKM
Subject: [eppext] May 2014: Extensions registry document to IESG
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:36:43 -0000

Looking at our milestones: May 2014 Extensions registry document to IESG

I don't have anything enqueued for edits to this document. I believe it to be complete and ready to go. Is there anyone who thinks otherwise? We need statements of support to move it forward or discussion to get it finished. Could you please reply to this note if you have any concerns or if you think it's good to go?

Scott