[eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase: Multiple Status values
Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> Mon, 10 March 2014 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B645B1A044D for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dKEkXA4Ru5iM for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbg.nic.at (mail.sbg.nic.at [83.136.33.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971351A0453 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nics-exch2.sbg.nic.at ([10.17.175.6]) by mail.sbg.nic.at over TLS secured channel (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) with XWall v3.50 ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:11:33 +0100
Received: from NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at ([fe80::a5b2:6e42:e54d:9d57]) by NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at ([fe80::a5b2:6e42:e54d:9d57%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:11:30 +0100
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase: Multiple Status values
Thread-Index: Ac88YXOTinDozP/TSWyHn1Bmrj0toA==
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:11:29 +0000
Message-ID: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE07514125C2A@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.10.0.163]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-XWALL-BCKS: auto
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/lwBltjpz3FIo6EElsqL1xagCXAk
Subject: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase: Multiple Status values
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:11:46 -0000
Hi, as mentioned during the London session, i do think that the text allowing multiple status values for an application is a legacy, and contradicts the transition state diagram in the draft. Therefore, i suggest changing the text in the draft as follows: OLD: Certain status values MAY be combined. For example, an application or registration may be both "invalid" and "rejected". Additionally, certain statuses MAY be skipped. For example .... NEW: Status values MAY be skipped. For example... thanks, Alex Mayrhofer Head of R&D nic.at
- [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase: Multiple … Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase: Multi… Gould, James