Re: [eppext] Re-Charter Progress?

Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn> Thu, 07 January 2016 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <nkong@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487651A8828 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.238
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wjv9UEpXFT_N for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B591A8826 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [218.241.103.146] (unknown [218.241.103.146]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0CZoU0_LY5WeaspCQ--.60034S3; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:17:52 +0800 (CST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
From: Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A126B50@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:17:54 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34B56CF2-491F-4559-8289-7D1B6AC1FF53@cnnic.cn>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A126B50@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0CZoU0_LY5WeaspCQ--.60034S3
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYx7k0a2IF6F4UM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j 6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r xl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv 0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z2 80aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxkIecxE wVAFwVW8uwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1l IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_ Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8Jr1l3VCjccxEccI2aVAqY2ADYxBIda VFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jTGQDUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: xqnr0ww6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/saVLUfKYwZeScoiZywdjOocS0Jk>
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Re-Charter Progress?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:18:05 -0000

I have the same concern.

Ning

> 在 2016年1月7日,03:24,Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> 写道:
> 
> Could our chairs and/or AD please give us an update as to where things stand with our re-chartering effort? Some insight would be helpful as we consider things that we need to talk about at IETF-95 now that the window of opportunity to request meeting slots is open.
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext