Re: [Errata-design] first pass: process, and questions

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 09 February 2015 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77CA180489; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:41:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4G5PlbUwGfu; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859EA180092; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (c-71-233-43-215.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [71.233.43.215]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1C552380847; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:42:23 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D8FF05.8030208@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:42:20 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9239970C-D961-4257-927D-9200330ECA73@fugue.com>
References: <54D01610.7040803@rfc-editor.org> <54D8E302.4020206@rfc-editor.org> <54D8FF05.8030208@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Cc: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [Errata-design] first pass: process, and questions
X-BeenThere: errata-design@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <errata-design.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/errata-design>, <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/errata-design/>
List-Post: <mailto:errata-design@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/errata-design>, <mailto:errata-design-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:41:53 -0000

On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> Looks good enough to me. There's more detail needed of course
> but the high level is fine.

Same here.   The flow charting is a bit odd (yes/no decisions should come from the same box) but gets the point across.