Re: [Extra] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-quota-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 12 October 2021 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7148E3A048A; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1D-V7aKsANT; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9AA3A0477; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1634062063; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=EiYJ39aHlwz+gwCMaW4WWDT9r5o8AxQkFczZOb4OjPI=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=rdn8GBClI1sNHU54fDSiTJI0QLznF4LZTiaoP4K223VNyDhChiudx8smglaltVdvJvgFPG 4BOjfEhg/PRaJ+Oc1lKbK/P/jTNNy8lXsYtwNlSTqsI7UHWdExbm0bUqcEQWH0v467k6OD 7zJeYycU4bCCEPFq9npM+WiTcu8ipMk=;
Received: from [192.168.0.5] ((unknown) [94.3.228.58]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YWXO7gABRza1@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:07:42 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-extra-quota@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com
References: <163395709731.25394.6019082657480195884@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <694e798d-6e16-3349-e4cd-d0aa78c9a881@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:07:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
In-Reply-To: <163395709731.25394.6019082657480195884@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/7TgGamNfy6CS9Di_x93eUp6R47s>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-quota-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:07:52 -0000

Hi Lars,

Thank you for the comments.

On 11/10/2021 13:58, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> DOWNREF [RFC5257] from this Proposed Standard to Experimental RFC5257, which
> the IESG needs to approve on the telechat. (No action for the authors.) I'll
> note that the ballot write-up suggests a status-change for RFC5257, in case an
> ART AD feels inclined to take this on.
I thought calling out DOWNREFs in IETF LCs was sufficient in the past. 
Has the process changed?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  [snip]
> Reference [RFC3501] to RFC3501, which was obsoleted by RFC9051 (this may be on
> purpose).

This is on purpose.

I addressed other comments in my copy.

Best Regards,

Alexey