IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Call for adoption and directly to WGLC - draft-brandt-imap-replace

Stuart Brandt <stujenerin@aol.com> Wed, 08 August 2018 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stujenerin@aol.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D091274D0 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aol.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHRugHATlifk for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic307-4.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic307-4.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.134.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FFD12426A for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1533696329; bh=Sj/+qN8XRP2jFFvFl9EAclRZ193DP1mGd0h+3qGILtc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=R9QZ/ZO93CoUnaUZOLOMiSpabKFgtaRi626In/sVFPkx4VC8wp/ltJDEyJbNUuBUBoQR+NrcR0m4OmmMh8dum5bA8AxYzAGEBD3ffXFJ8RWQNqpblhmsTR63JMWtEe/zO4h0uYXilmd98dDum+8pQADnK3pRuIAAE+P4SKiSEDu9Oc8KJDcCf+f9nviu8EnaQIxIv2rtB8Orcy3q9QVDn833G5ITREGE62kr5iFKZlMxHMX1X0nlC1DX7pNjGltRr0pnlrFlF2HoLfQc2V1Gc+oqiDTZkX6DOnU8FGCRBBvCPjPVbasoIWQxMklnsmXQ74O9CPiIac172iIei4MxsA==
X-YMail-OSG: 0u7YZpEVM1k6nB3bGljNqctv8NcSEqfeXIFk_AJWgPNtTZ7VaH6GYdER1Agzt42 MzR4R4tldtq7TCWG1tSxCcgrhdHmdRBFG3jjKOkSlo1dI_mUoVnj4AiqRTMYws_vmRFc2yNSUqqf C_mZ4HhvpheX4f4YpxSHDqZu__nNueSbEGqMfkNCud4z51m_sVj5ZGoxjllKt7y.0ltDysBM76xp k_viDrJU2rXwu7E46cfrSBXWktZA8tr3Rujrjsis1sNuElE6icl1sOMh5f79bE2BDJQXrV1_memz SK93FrvyL86twIhiAfftvhlBGteq5A._QP7pFQzo4JpdwU1uv7LZqvGufqoqTHXFKqlkzsFxs67v TDpmg20umv5zOSD7ul7SzFdxGvTYbPWcnlXgMMtU.HplmjFMfG4TWp3b9FokRPoPmi6zLqGc66BP UdpEmtgvd0u_CBSwegVTBJD14OiWCqzo.IFINusVBrtPemzhynhyJKO477ERHFJZZNdidgUuPIJ2 KBEwCSaCuUlIq9gQ7.sOqVZbgj0.5jazo5f3OzN.P19OIbnwAdPD3jLt_MOqO39gOiubwDTs.TD2 Ny.xhlSFd9VrMf1tJ7N227f6eokFJf4t8YriXb6NE5ieLSSs6KKcD9bVNDtx_EUy9l4sQxnPjWXi dxvigW3VNBwa7MrwKakYENdqvQXlAa8PL91YIZiqCjC0VYUMLtNWO4ECMPSiS7ygT7aCFbr3i4r9 Ea.SPTkitxA5cKbWR__Ub4yX4JITmczmvMbBzLfys31GdHOUCISkbRsO5rSRFZGZ8fyqQsE3hRDH .b6IDMhu45cOISslCa9YZZeFrMc25cT4wYS3VjJqxyvRTU0RRxEKlkmTvFoh1vgv4hS.QL0RZypZ pDXWgzM4u_a.yET9J0tvvbkjXmDUL1Cr_XDwtUFG0g_umAyDMXtMCbH4_WE0M3M2s4lzzgEe1lXI KDe09kAodCMpqcmADW6OCrd5Jq46ySMc0T1OcNjlCz2xKPep4lcU-
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 02:45:29 +0000
Received: from pool-70-106-225-231.clppva.fios.verizon.net (EHLO [192.168.1.13]) ([70.106.225.231]) by smtp401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 3c55b2b7f65bda131c21b64812592ffa for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 02:45:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B6A592B.4050909@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:44:59 -0400
From: Stuart Brandt <stujenerin@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: extra@ietf.org
References: <1532034526.1792463.1446606328.14CB8B22@webmail.messagingengine.com> <6831c19f-849b-409e-bf55-0f57ae985d48@sloti22d1t06>
In-Reply-To: <6831c19f-849b-409e-bf55-0f57ae985d48@sloti22d1t06>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/AYqpIVpKWzJsYJX9WQaBl_aWplY>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Call for adoption and directly to WGLC - draft-brandt-imap-replace
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 02:45:32 -0000

Bron -

Sorry for the delay in responding.

I have an update to draft-brandt-imap-replace-03 that covers Chris 
Newman's July 2nd feedback about APPENDUID needing to be untagged based 
on the interaction with UIDPLUS as discussed in section 4.3.

Two quick questions first, though:
1) I would like to cover interaction between REPLACE and OBJECTID. 
Should I wait a bit longer on OBJECTID, or is now a good time to add 
something in REPLACE?
2) The section that idnits complained about matches a similar example in 
section 3.3 of RFC6851 (MOVE). Is this precedent enough to keep it in?

- Stuart

On 8/2/2018 8:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I'm assuming the lack of discussion here is because everyone's already
> basically happy with this draft as is!  The two weeks is up, and I've
> adopted the document into the group and then directly to WGLC.
>
> Stuart, if you could please upload a draft-ietf-extra-imap-replace-00.
>
> Also idnits complained about the [UID] in the sample equivalent IMAP
> commands:
>
>        1. APPEND
>        2. [UID] STORE +FLAGS.SILENT \DELETED
>        3. UID EXPUNGE
>
>
> I would probably just take the brackets off the UID.  The "same effect"
> will still mean the same thing!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bron.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, at 07:08, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> The draft is here:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brandt-imap-replace/
>>
>> There's already been a bunch of discussion on the list, and the
>> document appears to be in good shape.  I'd like to kill two birds with
>> one stone, so I'm asking if there are any objections to either of:
>>
>> a) adopting this document into this working group
>> b) taking version -02 to working group last call
>>
>> I'll give two weeks for this.  If there are no objections given, I
>> intend to adopt the document and then immediately make a working group
>> last call, which will be an additional period of 3 weeks.
>>
>> If you're happy to adopt, but think there's more discussion required -
>> please do say, happy to do that too.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Bron.
>>
>> --
>>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
>>   brong@fastmailteam.com
>>
>>
>
> --
>    Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
>    brong@fastmailteam.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status