Re: [Extra] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9051 (7518)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 18 May 2023 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C37C1516E1 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1v0EOg3sDoud for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A5EEC151069 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-510dabb39aeso2721777a12.2 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684433064; x=1687025064; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FtFCXTwr6aVTn4xWqlgIrDlqbBtR8Oo3wibwdkjKgBU=; b=ZjyyAd4vCHmVkb6eU+KaiT47xiWiwrI9dRFDdJsecyhBDhiPlc6be4Gb8n8aNjHEDi h0YMsh0uE7/+DNtfWNRr+XnYBbv5PTrGGdIHep2kDcKkx4DdFxlAkyeRffFhTPghl6Zk ARVg2LnUSQ2Jh7FF+6xuxtVIy9X2YONhGvZgON4vNMecdfuN5O78Ih42r5T2Wg9PMiFr lZSNGB9cBlEfPYm+qYtBWmgYP61zvUHxRQtL+qtM1qq6AYHmW7rs32khzpHeRZaRQKVH 8qgzO3gLMg4WH74CJ6Qw9g0Jy/Y1iUA+NqFh/QeSvJbFRR4kD17jSovzq53KWoDWof9m uo4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwWA03bW17oZZEAAh81fuUKSyCaOmJY+OKAaMKNvWFR4mzLFu+Q AD/Fmfm2epFSToJ2NkC3+mkSkSQvIBjOa9zC7N/YZx9K
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5/xd8h1uVk+eQ83cd9qZMRTgCTGmYJzqLi+oRxiOpX+6he7IdncRaCcshMNTfSfNlRVGtghomB8jnHQ9GCPxA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:148c:b0:510:5155:24ab with SMTP id e12-20020a056402148c00b00510515524abmr5007004edv.24.1684433063989; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230518174846.0A9418541C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230518174846.0A9418541C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 14:04:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJKKBCxTxeFnCVC4Dbo9KGX03d_7jrGM=tJmTgdjbQEBoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, yaojk@cnnic.cn, brong@fastmailteam.com, adam@jooadam.hu, extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/NDEUlyxk7bhwfDHNW-4BO0X31hY>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9051 (7518)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 18:04:30 -0000

This should be held for document update, and the reporter should be
less impolite.

Barry

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:48 PM RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9051,
> "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7518
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Joó Ádám <adam@jooadam.hu>
>
> Section: 4.1.1.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    A set of messages can be referenced by a sequence set containing
>    either message sequence numbers or unique identifiers.  See Section 9
>    for details.  A sequence set can contain ranges of sequence numbers
>    (such as "5:50"), an enumeration of specific sequence numbers, or a
>    combination of the above.  A sequence set can use the special symbol
>    "*" to represent the maximum sequence number in the mailbox.  A
>    sequence set never contains unique identifiers.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Why am I required to fix someone else's sloppy writing?
>
> Notes
> -----
> The first and last sentences are in direct contradiction. Clarification is needed.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9051 (draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2
> Publication Date    : August 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Melnikov, Ed., B. Leiba, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG