[Extra] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-processimip-08: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-extra-processimip-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-processimip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specificaition. I didn't find any transport protocol
related issues.

I would request to add consequences of "processcalendar" action not removing
the alamrs as it says the action SHOULD remove alarms. What are the reasonble
exeptions that can waive this ask and what are the potential consequences if
this alarms are not removed before applying the action?