IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit

Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> Fri, 15 September 2017 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF41126BF3 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=O7MxSxPx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=s7+YI0K2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=LzPL3Uad
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLnpJGLX8Twz for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CD5132FA7 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3AB286A3AC; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505493090; bh=FOqyRhpVclKdIshAc1mum/5OPWjwHo1KJFZbUcclOvQ=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=O7MxSxPxl6dXu1VJ/plHa8uvc3ukjKrLIaWuTcRtrgW9nWk2dBFwhn20C45LbYkjd 2iZoMj6TBnv82AjAozTKteYzU9UlUXyyOjPEAvbNC0uo5pKK2QhTQ2jWwR48efMsnP mWw9Z2EcuJ75xPRmegSneNdhSIX3tastj78F1esm+FdKFQADJTxLKsiltkhUJnHPNx 5SGDZygYZh6cRUtqBsq2SOP5+DAtUghB9ZXCy5Hi6ghHQfDY0nqEeWtQ6PZuut7Fnk ZVxtFcyjuZ8QzRoWp/9eOkzH1VoGS5rwb1VY1E1Trytu5RAl8nc8tPTZnQR8eKOxl0 V2vS61z9abF6Q==
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E426A341 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:28 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505493088; bh=FOqyRhpVclKdIshAc1mum/5OPWjwHo1KJFZbUcclOvQ=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=s7+YI0K2okKV3ZLXsU9O3nxk7OnCNUgrPz1OKUNOIRoyw854eG/V6xA5H58MaqXZG ClcmS/OtyqDXBu8jWz2gqfF4AsddjfhraJK4a54TXE4nlA3f2UyONrSPDwXkZksMXe RyEOv1fDH6zKJ78yIhL4tSjBxfFWFM7vL8BXc7+S5s+czAcAwlYpyNX4Cc21R0VEU5 EAl87gzo7RtY62xbaOHdnXMbC8iZvqSuaQ3vZ6HDvCEFk7rSLbCzm3MSgcSgagJ4AA 1C6l8XbOP909H+jaaEt5GELHu4fntuSn2/nqY9QK01XTc0EvcsJopMSClQIoqcPg7B 98pMxDs7rOSPA==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mx2.open-xchange.com) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.1.8) (envelope-from <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>) id 59bc005f-034f-7f000001272a-7f000001b142-1 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:27 +0200
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B674D6A315 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505493087; bh=FOqyRhpVclKdIshAc1mum/5OPWjwHo1KJFZbUcclOvQ=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=LzPL3UadsG1ichamv+gX0hNDBhtFhE+696DnQ3ESUHZBIFYDpFFStn7EMqFX20nc8 XlvkW/qKcnk7NeX7RxysgSGRc2jf5GYyjSHwfNILTI6HQuiEZ1730FXTRE8+Zffm5s xc5DAfhIVA2Ya9toCR49PLGoFqwv3ZFnyMTvodUXfauWmULT5QR4V7lTfRcniQHgOg KelfJ8rR/cXiCmjoFQwye8EB1cSGKmb4NLC3vBy2QYbPSTtknpNOS6oXEDTLmA1jk4 aykQ/kOgLICBx4kqY8IxQ+eGKu0EDhLLYWLbfb8zl3IvuAz6s6pluUQ52TLcPM4cm4 rlt6BK04BuYyQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1B93C0D57 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from open-xchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap.open-xchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15AkJAfME9ip for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from null (appsuite-gw4.open-xchange.com [192.168.110.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9425E3C05C9 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:31:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:31:26 -0600
From: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Message-ID: <562521391.2365.1505493087094@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <712044986.2363.1505492959243@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
References: <0871fcf6-f0c5-a4b7-f1e4-7a535d78d776@rename-it.nl> <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com> <712044986.2363.1505492959243@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.8.4-Rev11
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-purgate-ID: 151428::1505493088-0000034F-E78DCDCB/0/0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-size: 967
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate: clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/RUnmgZZm2Hizu2OdYgQd74QHiHA>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:31:34 -0000

> On September 15, 2017 at 10:29 AM Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On September 15, 2017 at 10:25 AM "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/15/17, 12:07 PM, "Extra on behalf of Stephan Bosch" <extra-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stephan@rename-it.nl> wrote:
> > 
> >     I gave draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit a quick look. I have a few comments 
> > 
> > 
> > I too have a couple comments. If it’s called the 64bit extension, why are the numbers limited to 63 bits? Why not the full 64-bit range?
> > 
> > I’m sure there’s a good reason (or perhaps not).
> 
> Probably for the same reasons outlined here:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7162#section-3.1
> 
> Although that design decision should be made explicit in the text of this graph (or at least a reference to decision as outlined in 7162).

Ugh.

s/graph/draft/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email