[Extra] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-10

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 01 August 2024 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: extra@ietf.org
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.81] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B6FC14F707; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172251706001.2323923.13456610401605400336@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 05:57:40 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: ORMNX3ZZGIWH4HNHGLAYB66WH5ZORZMG
X-Message-ID-Hash: ORMNX3ZZGIWH4HNHGLAYB66WH5ZORZMG
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-extra.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit.all@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: [Extra] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-10
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/Vl1WT0ig04CTKG9Tl9SG-R-CfW4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:extra-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:extra-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:extra-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Ready

Thanks for the discussion of my previous review and for accepting my suggested
text that's now in Section 4.2.  I still think it's odd to have this apply to
UID EXPUNGE, but we've had the discussion and consensus is there, so I think
the document is ready to publish.