IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Revised draft: UNAUTHENTICATE

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1948312D95F for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qgwn27wh6noS for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [68.183.62.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897BD12DA28 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01QQFLJC4AOG00GYVZ@mauve.mrochek.com> for extra@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1521735092; bh=zMmS2K+N8B/s5g82e33/uJ43RcVWn3LarEKo5FDdDN0=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=hPm3RbCefmQ6a/njRqeEmYkXEsoQbL5zFrweyd65QWiu+lvaLARjyvEIjILGD5DNH qsnRqYsZqST3XvBfGQWAfJwWQYBPcw/0d5Twdce38nCYu/XQbT+wsqhJq1nH948dGD HuFooVNm2jvPffqZlMIbdy8n1Gx5vd3e1IODaE6g=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01QQ1J13T4YO00CZTT@mauve.mrochek.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, extra@ietf.org, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
Message-id: <01QQFLJ9788Y00CZTT@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:10:08 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 05:30:57 -0700" <9D530A17-23A3-4CE7-8B31-F8C28C7301A2@seantek.com>
References: <9E064A05-598F-40BD-A49B-4723C9EE6937@oracle.com> <01QQFDE0M3KC00CZTT@mauve.mrochek.com> <9D530A17-23A3-4CE7-8B31-F8C28C7301A2@seantek.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/WKe9-L7Nwrb1Vy-7j8i22lbt3EI>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Revised draft: UNAUTHENTICATE
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:14:28 -0000

> Sorry but I am not sure what SUBMIT you are referring to. Is this related to
> IMAP BURL (RFC 4468)? I also found draft-kundrat-imap-submit-02 and
> draft-ietf-lemonade-submit-01 but they appear to be long-expired.

RFC 6409, STD 72.

				Ned

> Sean

> > On Mar 22, 2018, at 5:14 AM, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:
> >
> > Do we want to specify a comparable extension for SUBMIT? I can whip up a draft
> > if we do.
> >
> > 				Ned
> >
> >
> >> I've posted revision 2 of UNAUTHENTICATE:
> >
> >>   https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-imap-unauth-02.txt
> >
> >> This has no changes from revision 1. During the EXTRA face to face
> >> meeting, I asked for this to be adopted by the WG and there were no
> >> objections in the room. Two independent server implementations were
> >> noted in the room.
> >
> >> I'm not presently aware of any open issues with the proposal.
> >
> >> 		- Chris
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Extra mailing list
> >> Extra@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Extra mailing list
> > Extra@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra

> _______________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email