[Extra] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-processimip-08: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-extra-processimip-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-processimip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document. And thanks to Bron Gondwana for the
shepherd's write-up including the consensus *and* the justification of the
intended status.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENTs.

"UID" is used by never defined (its meaning is rather obvious but why not being
specific ?).

Section 4 contains a SHOULD but nothing is said about consequence(s) if the
SHOULD is bypassed.

The document is great in the specification, but it lacks some explanations
sometimes (the "why").

Sections 4.4 to 4.9 contain no BCP 14 language, was it the authors' intent ?

Section 5 has a rather marketing term "highly scalable", as this section will
be removed before publication, it is OK but still unusual ;-)