[Extra] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01.txt

Marco Bettini <marco.bettini@open-xchange.com> Fri, 01 September 2023 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <marco.bettini@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C6FC151539 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Txtw0XtK6bcS for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (mx3.open-xchange.com [87.191.57.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BA3C1522A4 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.217.131.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30A246A0CB; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1693580102; bh=drITKGwrXZQaonGu9TbXjpHVO+XmQ+bohyqZ9SrI6Dw=; h=Date:Subject:References:To:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=5Heus7n4S5fJdEM+/zmblKG4kC5uBkGPyU5FI4ZmEU8j509GAswItZMy8mg2oFvE6 9HtmlWaC1oaw6L8xwcQlWYYWBfGhBvlXxvUcenKLIO1UpzGEsj7PsSf4icSt5k0RQT NDfU3TKuqUZwCxfQ8fp7a6IJ0DiEj6Ri9QlN4G3sjO6/CM/7GGfZfamg9dNq48lej8 sqovUp80YiJyBNY1jrkX82A7CEUu4HULetia1bzlZNT6eHvhJyHPV9sM8NtILUwMDA oKdnRUyMXOWCKPHzXBv/UyOdiysFo+XQ3wYiRqo8+zlHbV+LdEcQMUEG/biNbR34Xs cWBINwhyXXVjg==
Received: from [10.217.131.5] ([10.217.131.5]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id KfEDAEb78WRKohYA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <marco.bettini@open-xchange.com>); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:55:02 +0200
Message-ID: <40563756-e403-c514-c419-e139ca2f403e@open-xchange.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:55:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0
References: <c0f6998a-4ef1-c0e5-e5b9-e219b037c7a9@open-xchange.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
From: Marco Bettini <marco.bettini@open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <c0f6998a-4ef1-c0e5-e5b9-e219b037c7a9@open-xchange.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <c0f6998a-4ef1-c0e5-e5b9-e219b037c7a9@open-xchange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/gZDOJcPwxJBlo2firbLXd1FQcy0>
Subject: [Extra] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01.txt
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 14:55:26 -0000

Hi All,

>From 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/minutes-117-extra-00 :

> 1)imap-inprogress - 5 min (Marco Bertini)
>
> Comments from 116 addressed in new draft.
> Need to be able to flag feature availability of feature without 
> requesting it.
> Alexey: Need closure. Don’t feel strongly about removing capability 
> name or keeping it. Would clients change timeouts? Keeping it is fine.
> Next action: New version of draft

The document presented in IETF 117 was already conformant to the 
discussion that followed.
Therefore, this update just fixes a few nits.

Regards,
Marco Bettini

On 2023-09-01 16:44, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A new version of Internet-Draft 
> draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01.txt has
> been successfully submitted by Marco Bettini and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress
> Revision: 01
> Title: IMAP4 Response Code for Command Progress Notifications.
> Date: 2023-09-01
> Group: extra
> Pages: 7
> URL: 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress/
> HTML: 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01.html
> HTMLized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress
> Diff: 
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-01
>
> Abstract:
>
> This document defines a new IMAP untagged response code,
> "INPROGRESS", that provides structured numeric progress status
> indication for long-running commands.