[Extra] Call for discussion sieve-fcc and reject
Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 08:46 UTC
Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A9D1200C1 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:46:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=hnYsG5D7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=nKfRs2Fd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2vPVozfzkfy for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D521294A4 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BF520CC8 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:46:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:46:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date :from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=n7Mj9FxGhGOJe40xr6c3o1n2enSsm7E0pQFLk6swD 4Y=; b=hnYsG5D72Jrlk6zwim3vTmkT4N5KoyE8ELqmpF4jnylUWGEHv4tLdxRLD Eqghe6BfPTSSRXWuw7/PWITMV1SowkIOQ9TqeVbbgjGhsl0UV5SVFOV5VMIHQLeK Y556jwJFckK3xHTXKle030tjrx9qnB47fUtzLzxwyP9OrDLQs1QuxKbvG76KIWqG UIgJ7LoaO7dtoGKVNP6x6pb9L2CQNtCHan2etw3GOAyZcyb2u7sJ/asW2vW8HzDN rI6NOKbl0+fyO2OlYQc5Ii1dHlm6I+fC4FNIhjyBAOXnK3+7nhF5Jv1v9dkJpQf1 z2DLEb2ACNIHfBFYGciSO2S4B/18g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=n7Mj9FxGhGOJe40xr6c3o1n2enSsm 7E0pQFLk6swD4Y=; b=nKfRs2Fd7yB5kZXuTPDQlGi1eQ6WJABPonD9DI3FBRzD+ NmGlFrPMLmGRBrMz/80LKfpLVNZ9bacb17dIEb16Gt4NxAZBFaJgrSnaJTUDAcFk 0yyS8ShdicuEjoI/wY6JLL9u4KGEOoR7QFLIMSh4dr1kKFuo/tk4NflrVxUQIT1l fqih4F/HUKudLTkRGZYDS5m19u0VubvJjt58mhUIGx3p+VDcvGnnFeLfh2jkkRvt 6Hok3S1i5XPaT0Ia+5cGCjPn7rnTZNQCUEi+kRAmZ0hk9//SGe7ObmoYAQQEk+aw NEoaYsHYECS0ih5Vw8coQY0mLtXc8wIZA8VJGIaSQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3v4LWo2ncjxcvU4r7uozEudWVsYG7IKAEy0Ia_gd2g70cb2qE-hsUw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id DA26CBAB61; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:46:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1510735582.1708930.1173097640.724895FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_151073558217089302"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-f89283c9
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:46:22 +0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/hjdt2tuzuILClo1qIISuTbzy-wk>
Subject: [Extra] Call for discussion sieve-fcc and reject
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:46:25 -0000
This is call for discussion about the sieve fcc draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-00.txt There was debate about whether :fcc should be allowed on reject. From the document itself: Open Issues o Should :fcc be allowed with reject/ereject? o Should there be a separate capability string for each action that uses :fcc (e.g. "vacation-fcc")? Please reply with your opinions on either of these. As a listed co- author (though Ken did all the work) I will reply with my personal opinions in a moment (switching hats!) Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd brong@fastmailteam.com
- [Extra] Call for discussion sieve-fcc and reject Bron Gondwana