IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 03 December 2020 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7743A0C46; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:36:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FboXPZ3J0d3D; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f51.google.com (mail-vs1-f51.google.com [209.85.217.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5313A0C35; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h6so2016326vsr.6; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:36:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sAmf88nsN2NZy67jVoKaSCeFwIBVeYwkF6wjaOoNic4=; b=PVSwQWrnm6rSANXB54RlFU0RX9RnQGnvmpayq9vYsICx0iALek55N65VKWkzf/bVFK KhF7JJBxeV1kos8wAznU27+qFSgNieILU+Wf5EBukjACrIZetHWd0r7VfIEVtSiWpl73 /nvmhFZfWKUlvnHP3sPgdIF+lggPwpCoFOQIbUgf4yAC4tCYp9uQK6WM5kc95qLjiGq3 fm3r6s50ZLGotXbLTBb74Rlk99a1fyRgX5ThRAxHOlnmVamSdCviTX0bfeU5J9Rjcw0a tVZuovvzh4W4eRkeLjmxoc2+8rMH9y3zRZhyYsjKkiNzlf7bFGHWpj9i2POeeW76ifSA G7gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fG9/gMIelcFlrNBua3HfCe1gLwW8NsSU+01r0UJsNk2mNPWgx gzdCi5VoaQv3KTPDqLI85EtHrX9Kf0XL7/mgscblY67dLZQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKUpkiPlE/F4LzdOFILtfIYNOLyT/8ECKME22S8Q08iXjPw9+6jmwvS4VxAnptI7yy867uccrJjdWotBl37W0=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ff08:: with SMTP id v8mr1158031vsp.9.1607027761343; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:36:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160680275991.19519.15021073145558109806@ietfa.amsl.com> <04396f38-431b-48e8-8b0f-65e2518d8ed4@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CALaySJ+fLM42_edbkNx87MgYwqCM84WVQ9QBKe7NCT5nZhT0Sw@mail.gmail.com> <b9b4b82e-954d-4f63-94c2-44004bf0637b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9b4b82e-954d-4f63-94c2-44004bf0637b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:35:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+RUTOpCqmkKo+JSfMZ4F6QB2n_ri3HuOMGSM4kt_6icA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/mC1_xjTmT5ZgulKFVNCe_-kyRzI>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:36:04 -0000

Great... I'm putting -06 into IESG Evaluation, so it should get on the
17 Dec telechat.

Barry

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:20 AM Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, at 02:18, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> > And yeah - if the latest mmark is causing artifacts I'll see what I can do about those.  I admit I didn't
> > read through the whole thing in detail again after making the last updates.
>
> If it's easy to fix, please do, but don't get too wrapped up in
> spending time on that: the RFC Editor will be converting it to xml2rfc
> v3 anyway, and those issues will be resolved in that process.
>
>
> Thanks Barry, it was really this simple:
>
> -For servers which also support [!@RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes,
> +For servers which also support [@!RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes,
>
> Yep, I did feel rather silly.  My workflow already spits out xml2rfc v3 files, so hopefully that saves the RFC editor some work :)
>
> I've uploaded -06 with those two fixes, since I haven't seen any other feedback yet.
>
> Bron.
>
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>   brong@fastmailteam.com
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email