Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-07: (with COMMENT)

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 02 August 2018 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA400130E6D; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 05:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=sLBGSDNh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Saw1Aa1r
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkpEMnx9vh5y; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 05:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800FE130E64; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 05:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51BE294; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:59:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:59:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=qEKF01 w+C93ESH1HUE9GCAfaSTWot8mgJLsBFpr517M=; b=sLBGSDNhp0JONiHG8/RhQs c6tO2omGBa7mDXj/VrzLHg9rs4wBjYXvDQ5Kkj7O+CfBs3gW9W9AdJlMBsQit9n4 s2DzEekCigxeDv+xnNpfdgLvcIEq2x9xlhuFSg1f9WQY4FVrt/rSs2vwqPitzOge 8yzjsKz/j4lcN62E7bbwhg5os4/+ztw1doX2OFdH/VEHo4qnvKCmDV52WQo+aN5w O916ldNb6E+5ZTwk2jdZs+Dw5g9UAktCPPBVuJJKML7YZEON7rDgGnlxAPH4ivyU gGq0NKdh47/g07vNAVvkrrW3XAgXG7mDmBb98QDfbGLZPzb3yS5O1iYUqpycr3CA ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=qEKF01 w+C93ESH1HUE9GCAfaSTWot8mgJLsBFpr517M=; b=Saw1Aa1rJSGkWBRq35emKa kVoR1tqRuvQ+kmkJGcwv0W8N93TQ+/b/dZaFJuJrU8jIMa16ixC8fncXT7oeaXqn 8pqQEoQAcC8wWBCUB8w50vOohKdlAqhOe8XNNqwIcQcXjFRUj/7r+slsrPMlCazH ubLIa/yWQ3WqopmuoBrkWM8Z2x5HDIbetXeJj//nepMYo0wwYgthLsqwexTCLrNU 2tWfW+LYlaJtNkND3DixAjTsbVy5JnQkS13XP3WmV2ep63+gQM7Q0XWgoAnesxsO zDm7EcNPrrE/LCCzlU+j/kn4QRckgYX0ay1LQCPsON1/i/d79bg7lKzAmG2lcI+w ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MABjW7r9Ytnq8sfcTTprO8QMxPopasDKyj--R3KLeAb3JZQCSfH4vQ> <xmx:MABjW6HIiPoqLUiRf2wdPYFGpT_9ccTCcpvVqjlhUlzYSmYKtHDfMQ> <xmx:MABjW09KzOj033AGQwvO-mKG6c8z0MinPIV-BCsHMUHyZ70--Yxj2Q> <xmx:MABjWw1xVjxkrAPxhIrBsFihYtUcaoIO3UrHaAz3Oqz98XSyKBLOTQ> <xmx:MABjW1mQjBuvleHhmp9LCUi4KFEoFzaG_aLz5D3ILfQ4I8SeCjOavw> <xmx:MgBjWy4pCkJrFeJh3mwH7dNNzgxqqz0cYYWLZkceGKAwXCr22AW19A>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MABjWxSHCzpXYtnIxL1y4HukA1lA3iIMMJapLPUCQ1DCOp-BXFVlxg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id BB3C1621CB; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:59:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1533214768.3850163.1461149216.222A22A0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, yaojk@cnnic.cn, draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_153321476838501630"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2be8cd1b
References: <153306063928.3243.5362552823157836437.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:59:28 +1000
In-Reply-To: <153306063928.3243.5362552823157836437.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/qjUOak7MFH-P-Jx7c_OW7W4GSjw>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:59:34 -0000

Thanks Alissa!  Both very useful comments and I've merged changes for
both into what will be -08.
Cheers,

Bron.


On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, at 04:10, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> 
> Section 5.2:
> 
> "The THREADID data item is an objectid which uniquely identifies a set>   of messages which the server believes should be grouped
>   together when>   presented.
>         ...
> The server SHOULD return the same THREADID for related messages even
>   if they are in different mailboxes."
> 
> "related" seems like a broader characterization than "messages which
> the server> believes should be grouped together when presented," but I'm assuming
> they are> meant to be equivalent. I think it would help to clarify this in
> the second> sentence, i.e., that messages that would appear threaded if they
> were in the> same mailbox SHOULD return the same THREADID even if they are in
> different> mailboxes.
> 
> Section 8.1:
> 
> s/from the following set of 64 codepoints. a-z, A-Z, 0-9, '_', '-
>   './from the> following set of 64 codepoints: a-z, A-Z, 0-9, '_', '-'./
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com