IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Sat, 16 September 2017 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195DA1321A0 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=TE+QqxEh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iZMzOcLa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkkUbR9Gf1rx for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A65512426E for <extra@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8F521DEE for <extra@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:15:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:15:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=k8/6vywk1KVntg4n0 gdLZZ8QaVxgjg7qLgUsgT7gKk0=; b=TE+QqxEhXohPeprvA0VAxsMZ9DDZT/tH7 CEcvzk/zTX++xcvWmGIN4rvcI4BwqITtSezreSP1Kg+T7MYuNYCMsebqY37jZ3cX HWzl4owMMSBcN8YdQ3YCYZu2Lk8XizUr8hZGzg2awTx1ToYno946rBvUyab/TVOt fyF4i/2BDN2xUOupI8w/N3C0P/Ro2UmbAhrR51OFMcXanuTuax0CtvnxXLIJu5QT D4v2hYtQv3Tml+uQOCXn0HmKOk101NKr4yTwJbA6ZHwj3uRWy2wmaXrOP8JLLkFi sOURRVo/ZvHbwayIVVwriSbzjaGwdNIZF0O82A35eYIXOb4+unQ9A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=k8/6vy wk1KVntg4n0gdLZZ8QaVxgjg7qLgUsgT7gKk0=; b=iZMzOcLak0ehoxVh0Rn8G5 ZkQcA0y3wYFbITQ4hF1masj3AFuKnTunV6JCgssJmo1iBU2KobwMet2hgfLMDmAV CP0IPxtYmWtt1A0fiVLPtIpIpbzH237R940ZYSuDB+slaAPPWWYRHZlJunLkyRTr 9iXJCwTDpAo4zi64q8CZHOOT7ygivUYIipnq7k2aTG/l6xOirIV5fS4sgfS4lYcs NjdqhAIhGKnJU4vY/VSCnPLfO4of5v0R1eLQGFvaDsq9PeLjZUgOz+kAimHn+gX4 Z2fbvZjwvDjgP25VNmrC5ZwZ9uLoBgIb8t51VVcSQfQlZzXLvj+oYA2JvLcUJ2rQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:BEC9WU6rN6X_512jABoLk758xPqyZnJhXRHHNJ0g1heXNIuIcxKsWQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id E07C2BAB76; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:15:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1505574916.3734961.1108226832.6279CACB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_150557491637349610"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-64b08692
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:15:16 +1000
In-Reply-To: <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com>
References: <0871fcf6-f0c5-a4b7-f1e4-7a535d78d776@rename-it.nl> <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/t6Jyf-2ACC6kwNiozZ-smcwcfNY>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 15:15:19 -0000

Yeah, round tripping via a signed 64 bit value is nice.


On Sat, 16 Sep 2017, at 02:25, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
> On 9/15/17, 12:07 PM, "Extra on behalf of Stephan Bosch"
> <extra-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stephan@rename-it.nl> wrote:
> 
>     I gave draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit a quick look. I have a few
>     comments
> 
> 
> I too have a couple comments. If it’s called the 64bit
> extension, why are> the numbers limited to 63 bits? Why not the full 64-bit range?
> 
> I’m sure there’s a good reason (or perhaps not).
> 
> Tony Hansen
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email