[Extra] imap4rev2 route

Timo Sirainen <timo@sirainen.com> Tue, 10 December 2019 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <timo@sirainen.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAD01201E0 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:53:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njhjpyIQ8zk0 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sirainen.com (mail.sirainen.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7797312018D for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (unknown []) by sirainen.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F1CA2B3C8B for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Timo Sirainen <timo@sirainen.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Message-Id: <97DD9939-085B-40FA-844D-056A418ABC01@sirainen.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 23:53:05 +0200
To: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/tRid1hjbUZvAmXl6YWvPCvogFLQ>
Subject: [Extra] imap4rev2 route
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:53:09 -0000

> addr-adl        = nstring
>                     ; Holds route from [RFC-5322] route-addr if
>                     ; non-NIL

RFC 5322 doesn't have "route-addr". It has "obs-route". Should we in general make it a bit more obvious that the route is completely obsolete and neither server nor clients need to support this field? I was thinking of getting rid of it in Dovecot and just making it always NIL.