Re: [Extra] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-03: (with COMMENT)

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 10 April 2019 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF091202E4; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=DaXO6KRq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uKp9C3Tm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAn_7EZAwxWu; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9D3120072; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC2221FF5; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:43:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:43:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=hJY+c8Ncl6HtLFS+6EVIb56E1kAHE3Z CyYhVx80ySZg=; b=DaXO6KRqh9pls3ekEUA73uzPmXh/1QHv/ke2dPcRoU8KmS/ iBIdGIRDyytAovCNPCF7xJDq4RW1KnIUnfUJoItpM19gM/avbWcFmGoRbKexIzsM VzLrKgFcQqe6OP1KTdKCcj2FL4t5N5S4DVgcv8pRX6VcN4RrMYxiKFWDlJxOjQkD T+PVbqQ7kxN3SCcxtGeMpf9Fylntzov8kF3CBXMokKxdURMJwUfY2qPeBt1d6Rma Ct4HttYJXRFsIFQMTw3ubXA+hnSjLIhnviJt3s5oqGjLv6eMmahdXok5uERLUpI8 KxcGiK44TjnHB/f98eabRk7aFZOS7ZLosMzH+0w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hJY+c8 Ncl6HtLFS+6EVIb56E1kAHE3ZCyYhVx80ySZg=; b=uKp9C3TmpINOBKTXnJxNI/ OXc0suk8xLOLZC7uVKEiETI5Hu2UtCc7Y1gB4Nw29yIovcjlav+crAylQuXf/d6y lBVvCc70A5BMDjPLo1rsqcTc9kh85GZWf26LcMisMpDJRellebwMAfoNLURTBChM vqGRjRq9/ugHcWBBzvzZ1PGnVyXcmfOuFnHTv1RnU8FBcZszhsCc9Ewp0Yr3kN+X /htrYcbCuxOTumUsfUKlmFUP37wdlqax4px+NHuM/lQ/mlDtdMk8MNXJovJj65jn qW6E0xCBsUPmPDsS8vrvyVDFsgsK9iD5Kgqv6gwlaki0qawJ50Rz4N05W5SeQSWA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4eStXMqsqkZrKj0-KwLooMMzr0heOQdaR-pvs9Ml3u67P9CCwbyanQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudejgdehiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftehlvgig vgihucfovghlnhhikhhovhdfuceorggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfh hmqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhm rghilhdrfhhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4eStXDGByxc_T4e-oogKNJ0grnTIFKe2ws8nEZvQhlIMQxzFoVG4Fg> <xmx:4eStXA94x--vvw1ecIWQcDMmYQMIpant_G-tCVQbh5gob0F7C3aNfw> <xmx:4eStXARoMVTEyYXl8TMW76upVUbAnn4842EO4nvod7QB2fEv5HI1ag> <xmx:4uStXAK2xZ71wzuLWy7eCSV2cs1PXs2-SEXaiL-x3sShO34yJorGvg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9AC8AD48AB; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-329-gf4aae99-fmstable-20190329v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Me-Personality: 21611513
Message-Id: <d29de34d-f9df-4c87-aee1-b96635cfccc3@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4438481-DC94-4811-AED6-C28570161DF0@kuehlewind.net>
References: <155429292567.22949.15986765586199405904.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJw7Qy7URhUX+XAkZTBEgZA61ia4GKPta82YwkAv1J6XA@mail.gmail.com> <A4438481-DC94-4811-AED6-C28570161DF0@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:42:58 -0400
From: "Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>, "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>, extra-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/tTQnAifcqukkPq1zCX7SLRKcGw0>
Subject: Re: [Extra] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-03=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:43:17 -0000

Hi Mirja/Barry,

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> Hi Barry,
> 
> > On 3. Apr 2019, at 17:46, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> However, I'm also wondering why you don't specify straight away
> >> the use of the IETF Review policy as specified in RFC5226? Is there something
> >> different in there that does not work for you?
> > 
> > The difference is that IETF Review allows for Informational as well.
> > Realistically, though, I think it's just that this text was copied
> > from RFC 3501.
> 
> I would think that having IETF consensus is the important part here 
> (and less the internet status) and that's covered by the IETF Review 
> policy.

"standards track or IESG-approved experimental RFC" is used for other IMAP related registries, but I agree that "IETF Review" should be sufficient here. I doubt we will get any extensions here, but I think we want IETF review for them.

Best Regards,
Alexey