IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Reverting draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview to an earlier design

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 24 June 2020 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458153A0DE8 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mmym3DuQhWU7 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (mail-io1-f52.google.com [209.85.166.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323D53A0DE5 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id y5so2249534iob.12 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fwDnpUakN9afQAHE+HwgnsvFWvwhOa85FJsSGlWjfYU=; b=MpN6dw+D5nwBvT8xKwlU56PXB2zb8yGTk1VzeTuY4uSsqWiSTKiDGimlI42Fs25pKx fLLSXadhQz6AStOwCqWgynmeBAv64LW6+/3c8OZqpZoJ/jndGJ56PQJ3Ai6bNJJ6C1+s MfcpLz3RHdcBA5TmOGQWjX9FhG0CoG/VwFwQSe2ChSA46bwmV59Lws+AGwMcTSBlbGnw aZ0MJZX7NkgmSPKs6JlinSW5ymyLdyApKif7jgOWwxtti1YuccnH8lzD5Gl90eK/lSFw UWgqMXMW2uYWG+9JLWthtctHbHR/9YJ5RulBmPRb2fsnLripdoknl6mKfY74X4gantP1 KEig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530S16Sph1KVznvVgUOG8yf+LFcVcwxVPOZGlihMbo4LvC7Pkb+w KKbi/smLmkECcEVcFlpFGrvYTXSWo4c/aVUJyZo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypTqXqeKhK/RkQcKcGg3izrGeAvyk/iPyzAG8E0IW8pjThGsC66QDkJjDCmhS4BIfXu6JmBOX3Ax0an2mQ4IA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:13c6:: with SMTP id o6mr30261028iov.84.1593008069301; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bab06e67-a207-4b75-a961-9f95ee8501de@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bab06e67-a207-4b75-a961-9f95ee8501de@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:14:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLKPOBVTtMKgMHxB1vOADnBR+jxYxGZmACMZGJyhhDAOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/ztL_DdQz_cqT5puDCJWhHS7yYWs>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Reverting draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview to an earlier design
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:14:31 -0000

I think it's best to bring it back to the working group, so I will do
that.  Because it wasn't in "Approved" state before March it will need
more ballots from the new ADs anyway, and with the changes we're
talking about it should get a new last call anyway.

Barry

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:17 AM Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been in contact with the authors of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview, and they're not happy with the current state.  We ended up with something over-complicated.
>
> The suggestion from the interim meeting last week was to pare it right back to a very basic thing - just a single fetch item called PREVIEW which is plain text of up to 255 characters or so, server defined, no fancy algorithms, no nothing else.  If we want to add something more complex later, we can always do a separate extension for that.
>
> Value MAY change over time as server algorithms are updated, but it's fine to keep the previous version cached.
>
> Michael - do you agree with that characterisation?  Everyone in the meeting last week was in favour of doing that.  Are you happy to update the wording and submit a new draft?
>
> Barry - do we need to bring the document back from "submitted to the IESG" into the working group, or is it OK just to have a new draft submitted?  I'm sure we'll review it here either way.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bron.
>
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>   brong@fastmailteam.com
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email