RFC 1042??
templin@decvax.dec.com (Fred Templin) Thu, 02 November 1989 16:26 UTC
Received: from decvax.dec.com by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12776; 2 Nov 89 11:26 EST
Received: by decvax.dec.com (5.57/v2.4) id AA03465; Thu, 2 Nov 89 11:18:29 -0500
Received: by abyss.zk3.dec.com (5.57/dv.5.yp) id AA29966; Thu, 2 Nov 89 11:27:44 -0500
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1989 11:27:44 -0500
From: templin@decvax.dec.com
Message-Id: <8911021627.AA29966@abyss.zk3.dec.com>
To: fddi@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: RFC 1042??
Status: O
Hello, I've had this burning question in the back of my mind for quite some time now and although this does not DIRECTLY relate to IP over FDDI, I'm going to ask it anyway. (Since I'd be willing to bet that many of you are also wondering the same thing). Does anyone (or WILL anyone) implement RFC1042 for 802.3?? If so, what benefits do you perceive for this frame formatting over standard ethernet frame formatting, and what interoperability or performance issues do you perceive for non-implementors? Thanks, Fred L. Templin (templin@decvax.dec.com)
- RFC 1042?? Fred Templin
- Re: RFC 1042?? Dave Katz