Re: Multicast IP and FDDI
Steve Deering <deering@pescadero.stanford.edu> Fri, 02 February 1990 08:45 UTC
Received: from merit.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04599; 2 Feb 90 3:45 EST
Received: Fri, 2 Feb 90 03:42:30 EST from Pescadero.Stanford.EDU by merit.edu (5.59/1.6)
Received: by Pescadero.Stanford.EDU (5.59/25-eef) id AA04064; Fri, 2 Feb 90 00:42:26 PDT
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1990 00:34:00 -0000
From: Steve Deering <deering@pescadero.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Multicast IP and FDDI
To: Dave Katz <katz@merit.edu>
Cc: fddi@merit.edu
Message-Id: <90/02/02
In-Reply-To: Dave Katz's message of Fri, 2 Feb 90 004022 EST
Status: O
> Will the RFC1042 followon have the same sort of specifications? I hope so. Do you know if anyone is currently working on a revision of 1042? The 802.5 token ring is a bit of a problem, because of the disastrous state of the multicast filtering hardware on token ring interfaces. That means we'll have to define a different IP multicast mapping for 802.5, rather than just adopting the Ethernet scheme. Sigh. Steve
- Multicast IP and FDDI Dave Katz
- Re: Multicast IP and FDDI Steve Deering
- Re: Multicast IP and FDDI Dave Katz
- Re: Multicast IP and FDDI Steve Deering
- Re: Multicast IP and FDDI Dave Katz