DHUNT%enr.prime.com@RELAY.CS.NET Wed, 31 January 1990 13:37 UTC
Received: from merit.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07759; 31 Jan 90 8:37 EST
Received: Wed, 31 Jan 90 08:38:39 EST from relay.cs.net by merit.edu (5.59/1.6)
Message-Id: <9001311338.AA16483@merit.edu>
Received: from en-c06.prime.com by RELAY.CS.NET id aa05700; 31 Jan 90 7:36 EST
Received: from NET.Prime.COM by EN-C06.Prime.COM; 31 Jan 90 08:40:51 EST
Received: from ENR.Prime.COM by NET.Prime.COM; 30 Jan 90 18:22:59 EST
Received: (from user DHUNT) by ENR.Prime.COM; 30 Jan 90 18:21:09 EST
To: fddi@MERIT.EDU
From: DHUNT%enr.prime.com@RELAY.CS.NET
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1990 18:21:09 -0500
Status: O
To: katz@merit.edu Cc: fddi@merit.edu From: doug (dhunt@enr) Date: 30 Jan 90 6:11 PM Subject: IP over FDDI draft Dave, The latest draft of the IP-over-FDDI RFC does looks the same in both the sections on the A and C indicators and on ARP as the earlier draft. Since I had suggested changes to both these portions of the document, my understanding is that you have decided not to add these changes, at least for this draft. Can you review your concerns regarding the suggested changes? I'd like to try and address them before the upcoming gathering in Florida. Thanks. Doug