Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on fec grouping issues

Hi Ali,

That's fine. 
I just got to see the draft. Looks fine to me.

Cheers,
Rajiv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Begen (abegen) 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:28 PM
> To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); 'fecframe-proto@ietf.org'
> Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on 
> fec grouping issues
> 
> This is just for describing the problem and showing some 
> alternative solutions. It does not have to become anything. 
> That's why, it is intended to be informational.
> 
> If MMUSIC agrees to adopt one of the solutions described here 
> or comes up with a new one, then of course we should work on 
> that draft together, which should be in the cateogry of 
> "proposed standard."
> 
> However, note that MMUSIC WG should approve what needs to be 
> done here. And, that's why we need to tell them about our problems.
> 
> -acbegen 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva) 
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:17 PM
> > To: Ali Begen (abegen); fecframe-proto@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on 
> > fec grouping issues
> > 
> > Hi Ali,
> > 
> > We (the protocol team) should all collaborate to jointly 
> > author the new draft, if/when it needs to be produced.
> > 
> > Also, why should it be the informational draft? 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Rajiv 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org 
> > > [mailto:fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali Begen 
> > > (abegen)
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:04 PM
> > > To: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on 
> fec grouping 
> > > issues
> > > 
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > 
> > > So far, we could not ignite a discussion in the MMUSIC WG 
> regarding 
> > > the FEC grouping issues. So, it was suggested that I 
> would write an 
> > > informational draft, describe the problems and propose some 
> > > alternative solutions. So, that is what I did.
> > > 
> > > I am attaching the draft for your review. Note that this 
> has to be 
> > > submitted by Monday. So any comments within this week 
> > (before Friday) 
> > > would be appreciated. It is important that we convey our issues 
> > > appropriately. So, please take a few minutes to review the 
> > document. 
> > > It is very short, and should not take much time.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > -acbegen
> > > 
> > 
> 
_______________________________________________
FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto