Re: [Fecframe] WGLC draft-ietf-fecframe-ldpc-00

I've read this document, and I had just a couple of comments:

 - The last 2 paragraphs of section 4.2 discuss a max_rt parameter,
which restricts the ADU block size for the real-time constraints of a
particular application. Would it be appropriate to give an example
here? (this also applies to the simple-rs draft).

 - In section 7.1, some specific numbers are given on levels of
overhead required to reduce residual loss rates. Are these results
based on the [Matsuzono10] reference? If so, I think it would be
better to say so explicitly (and briefly mention the assumptions made
in that study; i.e., uniform random packet loss).

Cheers,
Martin

On 14 September 2011 15:17, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-ldpc/
>
> ..and another WGLC. Please read and provide feedback so we can close
> the group before Taipei and give David something to brag about. ;-)
>
> Thanks!,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
>