IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD90721F87E5 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1a8g9KvqnF5N for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1FD21F87C4 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2105; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335280538; x=1336490138; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=v5FampZclEmrrdRQL2jEbo1QAMTtSjNf3+CcStJZU0c=; b=l2Knda5GnO6HhG7BYEW7LFfVb6crmXjm4raza6TCGhm8gSV5z9XwmrJ9 C9xE0kqMxkmBpqN2DaHudkm5Zzu4TwsMYl0LQrOn8+sdiKep/GZXD0Hb3 BYvEGWC0/YhT87Qb28QNJwiy+P8bMkkmaBL5EkVsqoWmkR5WsIA4PelaO s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EANHClk+tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEsXiBB4IJAQEBBAEBAQ8BWxcEAgEIEQQBAQEKHQcnCxQJCAIEARIIGodtAQqaRqBHBIlngQyFe2MEpE+BaYJpgVQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,473,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="74363808"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2012 15:15:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3OFFbrt016765; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:15:37 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:15:37 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
Thread-Index: AQHNIh90doFQzZgBE0mW3o4q5cxAHpaqFYvQ
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:15:36 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994B6B611@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <4F9157AA.8020205@neclab.eu> <4F96AC94.1070902@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <4F96AC94.1070902@neclab.eu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.178.200]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-6.800.1017-18862.005
x-tm-as-result: No--52.438400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:15:39 -0000

FWIW, I don’t have a particular problem with this IPR on Raptor drafts. Raptor is used in several places and I don’t see why not we should document it properly within the FEC framework.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:37 AM
> To: fecframe@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
> 
> There has been no answer to my below question about what the WG's
> opinion about the IPR disclosure is.
> 
> I read the silence as 'don not like' the IPR unless the WG speaks up and
> tells me the opposite.
> 
> Please note that this draft is on the IESG telechat for this Thursday
> (2012-04-26).
> I guess the IESG will ask exactly my question and it would be good to
> have a response from the WG.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>    Martin -- your responsible Area Director
> 
> 
> On 04/20/2012 02:33 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 is scheduled for the upcoming IESG
> > telechat on April 26th.
> >
> > And as your new Area Director I have a question about the WG's view on
> > the IPR. There are by today (April 20th) 4 IPR disclosures with respect
> > to this draft:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor
> >
> >
> > What is the opinion of the WG about those IPR disclosures? Is there any
> > disagreement to move the draft forward or are all fine with the current
> > state?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> 
> --
> IETF Transport Area Director
> 
> martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
> 
> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
> Registered in England 283
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email