Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10

[Martin Stiemerling <[e-mail]>]

There has been no answer to my below question about what the WG's 
opinion about the IPR disclosure is.

I read the silence as 'don not like' the IPR unless the WG speaks up and 
tells me the opposite.

Please note that this draft is on the IESG telechat for this Thursday 
(2012-04-26).
I guess the IESG will ask exactly my question and it would be good to 
have a response from the WG.

Thanks

   Martin -- your responsible Area Director


On 04/20/2012 02:33 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 is scheduled for the upcoming IESG
> telechat on April 26th.
>
> And as your new Area Director I have a question about the WG's view on
> the IPR. There are by today (April 20th) 4 IPR disclosures with respect
> to this draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor
>
>
> What is the opinion of the WG about those IPR disclosures? Is there any
> disagreement to move the draft forward or are all fine with the current
> state?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Martin
>

-- 
IETF Transport Area Director

[e-mail]

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
Registered in England 283