[Forces-protocol] RE: Feedback: Section 6.2

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Wed, 27 October 2004 07:24 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA12476 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMiOc-0007Le-Vu for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:39:03 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMi9t-0005e8-5H; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:23:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMi7h-00054Z-89 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:21:33 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA12148 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6] helo=hermes.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMiLV-0007GZ-MA for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:35:50 -0400
Received: from talaria.jf.intel.com (talaria.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.7]) by hermes.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9R7Or2A031588; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:24:54 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.54]) by talaria.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9R7EAEo028097; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:14:12 GMT
Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.60]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004102700205111487 ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:20:51 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:20:50 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:20:50 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0257923F@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: Feedback: Section 6.2
Thread-Index: AcS5PhA7hDTxbKyLSSWBKJvkRbWkbACs7h0Q
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>, <avri@psg.com>, "Robert Haas" <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2004 07:20:50.0958 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CDEE2E0:01C4BBF5]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] RE: Feedback: Section 6.2
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jamal,

It seems like your comments on 6.2 are colliding with the comments that
Robert had sent, lets discuss this in the call (last 15 mins on agenda).
I am fine either way,

Regards
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:23 PM
To: avri@psg.com
Cc: Robert Haas; forces-protocol@ietf.org; Ligang Dong;
ram.gopal@nokia.com; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; Weiming Wang
Subject: Feedback: Section 6.2


- Section 6.2.1

 	     +--- T = Operation = SHOW
   		      |
   		      +-- FE NAME


What is the point of having this one operation called SHOW just
for this? Is it an operation at all given its position in the hierachy?
PENAME may have been a better name.

In the diagram: 
+ LFB Instance ID  and LFB Class ID 
should those just be set to 0x1? We already know thats where they are
going.
+ Type = operation, using the word "type" is confusing since it is also
used in the main header. I dont think we can avoid using the word type
in TLVs; my suggestion is we consider changing the main header type to 
"command". Thoughts? It is a command after all.
+ comment on SHOW applies here as well

+ "HBI will be exchanged with the CE using this LFB" ???

-6.2.2  Association Setup Response Message

In the diagram: 
+ LFB Instance ID  and LFB Class ID 
should those just be set to 0x1? We already know thats where they are
going.
+         
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Type = operation Show  |               Length          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
~                   FE Object LFB (optional)                    ~
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

What is that?

+ "HBI will be exchanged with the CE using this LFB" ???

+ Type = T.reason  ?

This brings up that we need the following speacial TLVs.

FORCES_REASON, FORCES_RESULT, FORCES_NAME.

cheers,
jamal


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol