[Forces-protocol] RE: Resend: Feedback: Section 6.2

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:47, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
> Jamal,
> 
> I thought we discussed this on the call and the resolution was to change
> the Operation name from SHOW to ADVERTISE. 

The issue has nothing to do with the name but where things fit in
in the grammar.

> I am not sure why you are
> bringing this up again, pls look at the grammar once...
> 

Because it was not resolved. 

>       PL level PDU :=   MAINHDR<LFBselect>+
>       LFBselect    :=   LFBCLASSID LFBInstance <OPER>+
>       OPER         :=   <OPERATION [<path-data>]*>+
> 
> 
> I think this fits quite well into it, and the Operation name Advertise
> is more general and can be reused as opposed to what your suggestions
> are.

Look again please:

--------
   	main hdr (eg type =  Association setup)
   	     |
   	     |
   	     +--- T = LFBselect
   	     |        |
   	     |        +-- LFBCLASSID = FE object
   	     |        |
   	     |        |
   	     |        +-- LFBInstance = 0x1
   	     |
   	     +--- T = Operation = SHOW
   		      |
   		      +-- FE NAME

---------------

The operation is Not part of the LFBSelect.

It should be:

--------
   	main hdr (eg type =  Association setup)
   	     |
   	     |
   	     +--- T = LFBselect
   	             |
   	             +-- LFBCLASSID = FE object
   	             |
   	             |
   	             +-- LFBInstance = 0x1
   	             |
   	             +--- T = Operation = ADVERTISE
   		           |
   		           +-- FE NAME
---------------

If you want to leave it there call it PENAME as i suggested.

cheers,
jamal

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol