[Forces-protocol] Open issues list ?

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Fri, 29 October 2004 05:51 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA11681 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:51:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNPtg-0005jb-GQ for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:06:01 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNPVn-000377-LG; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:41:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNPTB-0008Nm-SS for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:38:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA10801 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6] helo=hermes.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNPhO-0005Uk-4s for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:53:19 -0400
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.6]) by hermes.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9T5g8pr002338; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 05:42:08 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9T5fOuK029681; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 05:41:50 GMT
Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004102822380427705 ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:38:04 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:38:04 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:37:52 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579249@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: Open issues list ?
Thread-Index: AcS6EcAdW6oqqyLWQoCU1qgz0l0UQwDZtfoQAAApzeA=
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: <avri@psg.com>, "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2004 05:38:04.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[76072A10:01C4BD79]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Open issues list ?
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Avri,

BTW, at some point I thought you were keeping a list of open issues...do
we still have this ?

-----Original Message-----
From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com] 
>
> The WG should see the draft after we are done i think. I wouldnt say
we
> are.

i tend to disagree with this.  now that this is a WG document, and the 
WG is the owner of the doc, i believe they should have more frequent 
snapshots and should be brought into the discussions.

but i defer to the team and the chairs on this issue.

[HK] I completely agree with you on this, if we cannot agree on issues
we should start sending emails to the main list and ask for WG opinion.
This way we can make faster progress and keep the WG involved as well.


regards
Hormuzd


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol