IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [forces] draft-ietf-forces-model-extension

Evangelos Haleplidis <ehalep@gmail.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ehalep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C2D1AD0A9 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNo7wSlDIZtr for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9E01A0007 for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a13so3135316igq.11 for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IaXuyVefImLcUKIWykf6LuUqlNI2OSCnEB3Yj2geheQ=; b=f4iJIcpeGCQ+16z4aU3pdsUtN/GwdnWxl25RUf3KcQI2iMudPLS+3Gkql3XCX3qG40 j5U8YT1sThv778gCcxFhWUOYyxEIt1zQ3epx9ojKkSe7e8zjB/Gaz0HXPjF8FjdP2ONV Qy6p36DA/O6Ts7MJCQ0gxsTgNI2r8o199oMPz2czRvsFzl/LFa58+GopaYJ/bFgcl6gL obxN9VKO2VBKtVzqLXwpSr2MIexewHaRVjoDgeB5wzrTYFWQK2WYliA7++01bzJKUsU7 n4uJJL8aDsC35Fkz4+J/HywtwDkXhyJh540JESAULYINfOBfxyr+V7GIjQ0pkuNm52UX IlSQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.36.141 with SMTP id k135mr19634410iok.14.1414670370824; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.135.219 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.135.219 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <54516A5F.4050502@gmx.de>
References: <54475790.7000609@gmx.de> <54475DC7.4040402@gmx.de> <00e301cfedf7$5d323430$17969c90$@com> <5447ACC0.80904@gmx.de> <CAAFAkD8Qn95Msmnw9VqqRDHdG51bWuEc4g1a2fYwM+K61r3-Mw@mail.gmail.com> <5448F7BA.7010607@gmx.de> <54490B04.2000701@stevecrocker.com> <016101cff220$87c93720$975ba560$@com> <544EA57F.3020906@gmx.de> <018e01cff3c5$77c5c3b0$67514b10$@com> <54516A5F.4050502@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:59:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJPNJZTY_FHKqhuKAojFEEA5NmFr3j5wu6rCcurOZs1b0w4dZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Evangelos Haleplidis <ehalep@gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b5b0ed6ab60506a29cf3"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/GapodYgmSi4NsS0Rzs3diBxqMZw
Cc: Amanda Baber <amanda.baber@icann.org>, draft-ietf-forces-model-extension@tools.ietf.org, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, forces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [forces] draft-ietf-forces-model-extension
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:59:33 -0000

Greetings Julian,

Great, thanks! I'll add it at the AUTH48 and cc the wg and Adrian.

Regards,
Evangelos Haleplidis
On Oct 30, 2014 12:30 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2014-10-29 23:12, Haleplidis Evangelos wrote:
>
>> Greetings Julian,
>>
>> Thanks for agreeing with the text. The text was actually a suggestion by
>> Joel.
>> So, just a quick question. I guess that I shouldn't update the draft as it
>> is after RFC editor editing and into IANA hands.
>> In order to move forward with the document, do you mind if I add the text
>> at
>> the AUTH48 state? Or should I ping the RFC editor (or the one holding the
>> pen right now) to add it?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Evangelos.
>>
>
> Adding it in AUTH48 is fine, as long as your AD and the WG are in the loop.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email