IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [forces] AD review of draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization

"Haleplidis Evangelos" <ehalep@gmail.com> Fri, 05 September 2014 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ehalep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3DC1A0745 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HIDa0cWuD4w for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA701A096C for <forces@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k48so12024914wev.34 for <forces@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=kZFxpfRWuhkwAWDOASj4zG4gqE64TpDrcuua60GY06g=; b=vy1TzbjPwJ1sBJ6GV45G9QCIEorC5++mhXVZxwMMqzqPg0RkHJyALdL5Xut4BV+ki2 P+XIY7sENJBHY+oHrAlq+N8jhT15i4KpH7P7l9UE/9BPq/zKXKlJuePMTAH+EBvjmurA y8pRJF77g4VZhhFhid3Ukr8FbJtEApPUN6JkWvCk0GGo5xuwS8I+2o/VRIaamSxqCec4 lxoDz+0aTl8qF8dfbhvWdJT3HQ9b2+Bz9J+g+z4heWBANzHcmEoKBn8bdR+3yyBIphd5 1pMwkocpis6h3aJIcLCMRK6YiNqMw/RHex0D4J8rKQjmHuWvS1IJjq3ARKR3+otiCvhz ksVg==
X-Received: by 10.194.221.74 with SMTP id qc10mr15896756wjc.39.1409934599252; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EhalepXPS (ppp141237188192.access.hol.gr. [141.237.188.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ka3sm1943195wjc.3.2014.09.05.09.29.57 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Haleplidis Evangelos <ehalep@gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <055001cfc0b4$3f3b2240$bdb166c0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <055001cfc0b4$3f3b2240$bdb166c0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:29:58 +0300
Message-ID: <00db01cfc926$a432da10$ec988e30$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac/AtDtozAT+vPO+T8OhbRWTyCRa9wIcin+Q
Content-Language: el
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/dJmkhuy8hnJyAyomMzgDV1z8FX4
Cc: forces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [forces] AD review of draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:30:03 -0000

Greetings Adrian,

We have just uploaded the new version of packet parallelization that tries
to address all of your issues.

Thanks again for the review.

Regards,
Evangelos.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: forces [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
> Farrel
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:31 AM
> To: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization.all@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: forces@ietf.org
> Subject: [forces] AD review of draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization
> 
> Hi authors,
> 
> I have done my usual AD review on receiving a publication request for
> your draft.
> 
> I have a question, a request, and a suggestion.
> 
> I'll put the document into "Revised I-D" state until we have resolved
> these issues.
> 
> Thanks for the work,
> Adrian
> 
> ---
> 
> Is this really standards track and not experimental? The reason I ask
> is because it sounds (to me) that packet parallelization is quite an
> advanced feature that may have some "interesting" behavioral
> characteristics. If you tell me that, "this is stable, we know what we
> are doing, the implementations that exist are really being deployed"
> then I'll be happy. If you say "we have an implementation and are
> seeing how it behaves" then perhaps you should consider whether this is
> an experiment.
> 
> This is a topic for discussion. You don't have to make a change until
> we have covered the ground and understand what we are dealing with.
> 
> ---
> 
> The IANA Considerations section needs some work. Please:
> - Name the registries where you are requesting code points.
> - Please request allocations (i.e. don't write descriptive text)
> - the values you are asking for appear to come from the Standards
>   Action space: why mention FCFS?
> - Do you *need* the values you are asking for (18-20 and x10), are you
>   suggesting them, or do you not actually care? You need to make this
>   clear in your text.
> 
> ---
> 
> Some comments from the document shepherd are recorded in the write-up
> and should get some attention from the authors.
> 
> Additionally, there is some English that could benefit from a quick re-
> read and some polish.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email