IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [forces] WG LC: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization WAS(Re: WG last call: draft-ietf-forces-protoextension

"Joachimpillai, Damascene M" <damascene.joachimpillai@verizon.com> Thu, 10 July 2014 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <damascene.joachimpillai@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F2E1B28E6 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chQ0zU-pKscT for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fldsmtpe01.verizon.com (fldsmtpe01.verizon.com [140.108.26.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3DE1B28E1 for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=damascene.joachimpillai@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1404996902; x=1436532902; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7QdCozQqMaFd9v5jMBfhob1DtM6mZXY+G4FUi9so2Ls=; b=BC+vO9ngzPNrF+WE2rMcBecD19e+uEklNjt+HNdamc1eBA1q2EMbwxE4 7OH+Hv/OUN+T4WIFzLtAtQwpWOhs31qqiFg9Wc/SHqpvl3XpChT20Tkv/ MZGLw5/cdQX7zxVJYGOy3woIAwKy42vDrxNheoG/he8WsD4hWIxTOdCdH c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by fldsmtpe01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2014 12:55:01 +0000
From: "Joachimpillai, Damascene M" <damascene.joachimpillai@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,637,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="796892574"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb03.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.190]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2014 12:55:01 +0000
Received: from FHDP1LUMXC7V31.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.125.32]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.190]) with mapi; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:55:01 -0400
To: 'Jamal Hadi Salim' <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:55:00 -0400
Thread-Topic: WG LC: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization WAS(Re: [forces] WG last call: draft-ietf-forces-protoextension
Thread-Index: Ac+bxDPaAkz1FLipRdu7u/mvr+JBCwAedZvQ
Message-ID: <689CE984BDBA8B4CAF3EA6E2CDC5CACB0139EE892E@FHDP1LUMXC7V31.us.one.verizon.com>
References: <CAAFAkD-Fu_WE-ZTb2kkiMnvmyLkiYj3jPxeU+kDCDkiT+=bjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFAkD-Fu_WE-ZTb2kkiMnvmyLkiYj3jPxeU+kDCDkiT+=bjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/oa7F0X14u7gNfY14EYMXxkMbq9w
Cc: "forces@ietf.org" <forces@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [forces] WG LC: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization WAS(Re: WG last call: draft-ietf-forces-protoextension
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:55:04 -0000

Pardon my mistake. It should have read WG LC: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization

Good to see you are still up Jamal!

-- DJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@mojatatu.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 6:22 PM
To: Joachimpillai, Damascene M
Cc: forces@ietf.org
Subject: WG LC: draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization WAS(Re: [forces] WG last call: draft-ietf-forces-protoextension

DJ,

I think you meant to say in the subject line draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization ;->

cheers,
jamal

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Joachimpillai, Damascene M <damascene.joachimpillai@verizon.com> wrote:
> Jamal and I would like to start the two week working group last call 
> for draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization.  The document may be found here:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-packet-parallelization-00
>
>
>
> The authors are advised to try to resolve as many of the comments as 
> possible (on the mailing list) as they come in, but not to post the 
> new version of the draft until the wglc is closed and the comments are resolved.
>
>
>
> This working group last call will end on July 23rd 2014.
>
>
>
> n  DJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email